Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Taylor/Maxfield

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W PM

21 players · average NTRP 3.53 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Angela Bleak
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Janee Roper
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.41
Jeanette Shepard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Michelle Maxfield
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.35
Bessy Nielson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Melissa Hofmann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.28
Diane Creamer
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Heather Hayes
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Alena Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Angie Nelden
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Michelle Cutler
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Inga Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Kelly Webster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.18
Jennie Bethers
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.16
Manal Hall
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.10
Maria Lombardi
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.10
Carolyn Cottle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.06
Mindi Paskins
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.00
Malisa Bowen
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.78
Karen Rozsa
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Julie Hall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alena Taylor + Melissa Hofmann3353% games+11.7% vs expected
Maria Lombardi + Jennie Bethers4159% games+10.6% vs expected
Michelle Maxfield + Melissa Hofmann5164% games+8.9% vs expected
Alena Taylor + Angela Bleak4255% games+8.5% vs expected
Alena Taylor + Michelle Maxfield7850% games+7.3% vs expected
Manal Hall + Melissa Hofmann2352% games+7.2% vs expected
Bessy Nielson + Maria Lombardi5255% games+7.1% vs expected
Jeanette Shepard + Mindi Paskins12359% games+6.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Bleak
214W–163L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Janee Roper
146W–123L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Jeanette Shepard
195W–143L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Michelle Maxfield
204W–139L career · 7 lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Bessy Nielson
213W–160L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
Melissa Hofmann
90W–57L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Diane Creamer
116W–110L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Heather Hayes
84W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Alena Taylor
174W–200L career · 10 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Angie Nelden
80W–72L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Michelle Cutler
149W–101L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Inga Nelson
162W–124L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
Kelly Webster
197W–131L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Jennie Bethers
125W–120L career · 8 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Manal Hall
111W–167L career · 7 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Maria Lombardi
228W–163L career · 7 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Carolyn Cottle
113W–130L career · 6 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Mindi Paskins
238W–179L career · 5 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Malisa Bowen
182W–149L career · 9 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Karen Rozsa
187W–205L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
Julie Hall
24W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.