Teams

IE-Redlands-Rydell

2026 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - IE · IE Women 6.0(2)

10 players · average NTRP 3.06 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-05-31vs IE-CCCC-KayLost 12
L#1 DoublesJean Kielhold / Elizabeth Rydall vs Janet Giles / Theresa Winterburn1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Cole / Rene Sarver vs Ade Quingco / Elena Saydah6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDebby Weigand / Donna Crow vs Jeannie Adair / Amy Garrett2-6, 2-6
2026-05-30vs IE-TCC-CroushoreWon 20
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Cole / Elizabeth Rydall vs Susan Brosche / Claudia Strauss6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCesaria Vazquez / Avis Attaway vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-24vs IE-CCCC-KayWon 20
W#1 DoublesSandy Wible / Laura Hibbard vs Theresa Winterburn / Janet Giles6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCesaria Vazquez / Elizabeth Rydall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-16vs IE-TCC-CroushoreWon 30
W#1 DoublesDenise Stewart / Donna Crow vs Florence Bulleit / Ruth Heise6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAvis Attaway / Elizabeth Cole vs Betsy Weinberger / Amy Croushore7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnnette Flores / Sesilie Kay vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-09vs IE-TCC-CroushoreSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSesilie Kay / Donna Crow vs SUSAN PEDERSON / Claudia Strauss6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCesaria Vazquez / Avis Attaway vs Ruth Heise / Susan Brosche3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-05-02vs IE-TCC-CroushoreWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Garrett / Annette Flores vs Betsy Weinberger / Patricia Ash6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaria Fernandez / Elizabeth Rydall vs Susan Brosche / Claudia Strauss6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDebby Weigand / Terri Franklin vs SUSAN PEDERSON / Ruth Heise6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-25vs IE-TCC-CroushoreWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Cole / Debby Weigand vs Ruth Heise / SUSAN PEDERSON6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Hibbard / Terri Franklin vs Susan Brosche / Claudia Strauss6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMaria Fernandez / Elizabeth Rydall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-18vs IE-TCC-CroushoreWon 20
W#2 DoublesAvis Attaway / Laura Hibbard vs Amy Croushore / Julia Metzler6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDonna Crow / Debby Weigand vs Claudia Strauss / Florence Bulleit6-0, 6-3
2026-04-11vs IE-CCCC-KayWon 20
W#2 DoublesSandy Wible / Laura Hibbard vs Karen El-Kara / Ade Quingco6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJean Kielhold / Elizabeth Cole vs Nanette Pratini / Sesilie Kay6-2, 6-2
2026-03-28vs IE-CCCC-KaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Hibbard / Sandy Wible vs Theresa Winterburn / Karen El-Kara6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Crow / Maria Fernandez vs Vivian Weston / Janet Giles6-7, 2-6
2026-03-22vs IE-CCCC-KayWon 20
W#1 DoublesDenise Stewart / Debby Weigand vs Ade Quingco / Elena Saydah6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Hibbard / Becky Gagnon vs Theresa Winterburn / Vivian Weston6-3, 6-1
2026-03-14vs IE-CCCC-KaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJean Kielhold / Laura Hibbard vs Karen El-Kara / Christine Sauceda6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCesaria Vazquez / Elizabeth Cole vs Sesilie Kay / Nanette Pratini5-7, 2-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · IE Women 6.0(2)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IE-Redlands-Rydell60162575

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Laura Hibbard
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.12
Cesaria Vazquez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Donna Crow
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.94
Elizabeth Rydall
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.92
Debby Weigand
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.92
Elizabeth Cole
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Annette Flores
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Sesilie Kay
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.26
Avis Attaway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Terri Franklin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Hibbard + Sesilie Kay134 matchesnot enough data
Sesilie Kay + Elizabeth Rydall123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Laura Hibbard
126W–44L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Cesaria Vazquez
45W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.12
3
Donna Crow
11W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Elizabeth Rydall
105W–82L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Debby Weigand
4W–1L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Elizabeth Cole
9W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Annette Flores
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Sesilie Kay
134W–145L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
Avis Attaway
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
Terri Franklin
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.