Teams

Dallas/JB/3Oaks

2026 Mixed 18 & Over 3.0, 4.0, 10.0 · 4.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-22vs Cissell/JB/RPCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesRichard Milton / Madison Matthews vs Chris Evins / Kaylee Berry3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTristan Webber / Hannah Fulmer vs Matt Rankin / Abigail Cissell6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRichard Daniel / Megan Ragsdale vs John Koch / Shelley Cissell1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-07-07vs Cissell/JB/RPCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Daniel / Shannon Crocker vs Dylan Vance / Mollie Vance5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Matthews / Megan Ragsdale vs Matthew Hill / Bella Seeman4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Milton / Hannah Fulmer vs Matt Rankin / Abby Rogers3-6, 6-7
2026-06-17vs Cissell/JB/RPCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesRichard Daniel / Cherry Dallas vs Matthew Hill / Bella Seeman3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Milton / Hannah Fulmer vs Matt Rankin / Abigail Cissell1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesTristan Webber / Margo Hafner vs Chris Evins / Cortni Thomas6-4, 6-4
2026-06-10vs Cissell/JB/RPCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesTristan Webber / Margo Hafner vs John Koch / Shelley Cissell6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRichard Daniel / Megan Ragsdale vs Mollie Vance / Dylan Vance4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Milton / Hannah Fulmer vs Matthew Hill / Kaylee Berry6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-20vs Cissell/JB/RPCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesTristan Webber / Shannon Crocker vs Dylan Vance / Abby Rogers1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Matthews / Madison Matthews vs Chris Evins / Cortni Thomas4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Daniel / Cherry Dallas vs Matt Rankin / Abigail Cissell4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Margo Hafner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Hannah Fulmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Megan Ragsdale
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Richard Daniel
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.36
Cherry Dallas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Andrew Dallas
published 3.5
3.25
Madison Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Richard Milton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Shannon Crocker
published
Steven Matthews
published
Tristan Webber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherry Dallas + Richard Daniel8258% games+4.5% vs expected
Hannah Fulmer + Richard Milton033 matchesnot enough data
Cherry Dallas + Andrew Dallas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margo Hafner
22W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Hannah Fulmer
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Megan Ragsdale
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
Richard Daniel
33W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Cherry Dallas
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Andrew Dallas
14W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.35
Madison Matthews
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Richard Milton
32W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
Shannon Crocker
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven Matthews
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tristan Webber
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.