Teams

MGriffiths-CHTC

2025 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Weekend

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesAi-Jiuan Wu / Laura Malahias vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-20vs ABoone-BPSplit 11
L#1 DoublesColleen Starns / Sandra Stowe vs Karen Schmitz / Liza Terll0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAi-Jiuan Wu / Lizzy Burch vs Lori Salzmann / Katy McReynolds6-0, 6-0
2025-09-13vs DBaker40-DURWon 10
W#1 DoublesLizzy Burch / Destiny Lopez vs Amy Singer / Kim Hutter7-6, 6-0
2025-09-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesSandra Stowe / Colleen Starns vs Sarah Johnson / Kristen Anderson6-1, 6-1
2025-08-23vs JScaglione-TOCHWon 10
W#1 DoublesDestiny Lopez / Colleen Starns vs Cecilia Gonzales / Areli Grodski6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-16vs LBonzani-DURWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandra Stowe / Colleen Starns vs Matalaba Napier / Kelli Moore6-0, 6-2
2025-08-09vs ABoone-BPWon 10
W#1 DoublesAi-Jiuan Wu / Suzie Roth vs Ann Laros / Martha Pearson6-4, 6-0
2025-08-02vs DBaker40-DURWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Flanagan / Lizzy Burch vs Gretchen LoFrese / Pamela Howell-Davis6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAi-Jiuan Wu / Colleen Starns vs Kim Hutter / Kristi Brubaker6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Ai-Jiuan Wu
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.05
Mary Griffiths
published
2.98
Lizzy Burch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Sarah Morales
published
2.85
Destiny Lopez
published 3
2.77
Suzie Roth
published
2.66
Denise Stabenau
published 3
2.57
Laura Malahias
published
2.48
Colleen Starns
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.35
Chrissy King
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ai-Jiuan Wu
36W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
Mary Griffiths
29W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Lizzy Burch
44W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Sarah Morales
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Destiny Lopez
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Suzie Roth
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.77
3
Denise Stabenau
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Laura Malahias
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
2.5
Colleen Starns
42W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Chrissy King
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.