Teams

CP-Skilton

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Daniel Warren
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Henry Rawas
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-05-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHenry Rawas / Leslie Gardner vs Jeff Bailey / Lloyd Sandquist6-3, 6-3
2019-05-19Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJohn Pope / Daniel Warren vs Christopher McReynolds / Karl Crabs6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPaul Raff / Henry Rawas vs Mark Revere / Wally Euyang6-3, 7-5
2019-05-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBuck Cockrell / Henry Rawas vs Mohan Varthakavi / Rajesh Gatti6-3, 6-1
2019-05-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Pope / Henry Rawas vs Chuck Kelley / Mark Hanses6-0, 6-1
2019-04-27Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAntonio Skilton / Daniel Warren vs Christopher Loiselle / Sanjiv Parikh6-4, 6-0
2019-04-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHenry Rawas / Oliver Graves vs Matthew Dannemiller / Grant Hartvigson6-0, 6-3
2019-04-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGirish Patwardhan / Henry Rawas vs Chris Barry / Jeremy Lewis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2019-03-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGirish Patwardhan / Henry Rawas vs Greg Miller / David Cerino6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Daniel Warren
79W–79L career
0%61%39%
3.08
3
Henry Rawas
26W–44L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.