Teams

Serve Me A Double

Summer Adult 18 & Over NA WeekDAY Doubles · Womens 3.5 SumrDubsWkdy

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-01-18vs Points TakenWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeslie Hodge / Laurie Moore vs Cara Asher / Ann Foley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie McKenzie / Paula Greenfield vs Dana Ivers / Dee Dee Brooks6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRuthie Bury / Annie Fojtik vs Lynette Doughty / Michele Seghers6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.5 SumrDubsWkdy have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kalin Boenig
published
3.41
Sarah Montgomery
published
3.35
Stephanie McKenzie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Beata Deitrick
published 3.5
3.30
Leslie Hodge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Laurie Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brenda Langford
published 3.5
3.22
Rebecca Russo
published
3.20
Sheri Hunter
published
3.16
Tara Rumaner
published
3.16
Amy Morino
published 3.5
3.14
Annie Fojtik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Laurie Teichman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Rumaner + Kalin Boenig13752% games+6.2% vs expected
Annie Fojtik + Laurie Moore3258% games+5.6% vs expected
Sheri Hunter + Leslie Hodge7161% games+5.2% vs expected
Stephanie McKenzie + Amy Morino3351% games+3.7% vs expected
Sheri Hunter + Kalin Boenig224 matchesnot enough data
Kalin Boenig + Leslie Hodge134 matchesnot enough data
Tara Rumaner + Sheri Hunter123 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie McKenzie + Laurie Teichman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kalin Boenig
29W–19L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
Sarah Montgomery
35W–15L career · no lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
3.41
Stephanie McKenzie
24W–29L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Beata Deitrick
29W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Leslie Hodge
14W–15L career · 1 line in 2022
94%6%<1%
3.30
Laurie Moore
24W–21L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Brenda Langford
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Russo
64W–67L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Sheri Hunter
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.20
Tara Rumaner
33W–24L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Amy Morino
32W–39L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Annie Fojtik
35W–25L career · 1 line in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Laurie Teichman
28W–39L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.