Teams

PINELLAS/Kelsey

2022 Pinellas Combo 50 & Over Fall · 6.5 W Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-19vs Tarpon BourgeoisWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Remie / Sue Francis vs Stephanie Coleman / Judy Carlin6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSherrl Fry / Christine Price vs Joan Johnson / Susan Weissler6-2, 7-5
2022-11-12vs SPTC FireballersWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Remie / Sue Francis vs Susan Davis / Amy Ladden6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSherrl Fry / Christine Price vs Lisa Jacome / Bobbi-Jo Willett6-2, 6-4
2022-11-05vs Treasure Bay Island ServivorsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnne Remie / Christine Price vs Debi Billington / Kathleen Noonan6-4, 7-6
2022-10-30vs Tarpon BourgeoisWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Remie / Sue Francis vs Gail Eberhardt / Susan Weissler7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHarriet Cregann / Christine Price vs Ellen Hellmers / Cynthia Sperling7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-10-29vs SPTC FireballersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Jordan / Christine Price vs Diane Haymes / Amy Ladden5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Remie / Theresa Walker vs Rima Terradista / Bobbi-Jo Willett6-2, 6-3
2022-10-22vs ELW ShotchasersWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Remie / Sue Francis vs Ann Petracco / Noella Burgeson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Jordan / Christine Price vs Debra Burwell / Robyn Houston6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-09-24vs Treasure Bay Island ServivorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesHarriet Cregann / Christine Price vs Michele Girardi / Jacquelyn Dawson6-0, 6-0
2022-09-17vs ELW ShotchasersLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Remie / Christine Price vs Ana Jara / Noella Burgeson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Harriet Cregann
published 4
3.29
Anne Remie
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.23
Carol Vitelli
published 3.5
3.20
Terry Kelsey
published
3.14
January Moennig
published
3.13
Sally Blush
published
3.08
Sue Francis
published
3.02
Christine Price
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Sherrl Fry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Price + Anne Remie4351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Harriet Cregann
9W–17L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Anne Remie
136W–73L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Carol Vitelli
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Terry Kelsey
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
January Moennig
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
Sally Blush
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Sue Francis
2W–15L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Christine Price
99W–86L career · 8 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
Sherrl Fry
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.