Teams

Sirianni

2025 Leon TriLevel 18 & Over · 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-26vs Leon/Bush/Trilevel3.5/3.0/2.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesLee Lemay / Johanna Calhoun vs Chansamone Bryant / Mariela Bartens3-6, 1-6
2025-10-19vs Leon/Bush/Trilevel3.5/3.0/2.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTracey Cohen / Lee Lemay vs Becky Bush / Kelley Corbari3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVirginia Dailey / Katie Walton vs Sally Davis / Kimberly Curry6-7, 5-7
2025-10-12vs Leon/Bush/Trilevel3.5/3.0/2.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracey Cohen / Virginia Dailey vs Becky Bush / Olivia McCaffery2-6, 4-6
2025-10-05vs Leon/Bush/Trilevel3.5/3.0/2.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEllen Rainey / Lee Lemay vs Mariela Bartens / Nancy Donahue6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVirginia Dailey / Jamie Braun vs Sally Davis / Linda Huffman0-6, 2-6
2025-09-28vs Leon/Bush/Trilevel3.5/3.0/2.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesTracey Cohen / Lee Lemay vs Elizabeth Murray / Kelley Corbari4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMaryrose Sirianni / Debbie Hall vs Kristen Knapp / Kimberly Curry2-6, 1-6
2025-09-21vs Leon/Bush/Trilevel3.5/3.0/2.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracey Cohen / Lee Lemay vs Kelley Corbari / Olivia McCaffery4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-14vs Leon/Bush/Trilevel3.5/3.0/2.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesTracey Cohen / Ellen Rainey vs Elizabeth Murray / Nancy Donahue2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesVirginia Dailey / Debbie Hall vs Kristen Seaquist / Kristen Knapp1-6, 3-6
2025-09-07vs Leon/Bush/Trilevel3.5/3.0/2.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Rainey / Lee Lemay vs Chansamone Bryant / Mariela Bartens5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Tracey Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Lee Lemay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ellen Rainey
published 3.5
2.73
Debbie Hall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Katie Walton
published
2.51
Stephanie Hodges
published
2.47
Lena Juarez
published
Johanna Calhoun
published
Maryrose Sirianni
published
Virginia Dailey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Hall + Maryrose Sirianni134 matchesnot enough data
Lee Lemay + Tracey Cohen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tracey Cohen
64W–64L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Lee Lemay
45W–59L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Ellen Rainey
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Debbie Hall
25W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Katie Walton
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
Stephanie Hodges
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
Lena Juarez
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%59%41%
2.47
Johanna Calhoun
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maryrose Sirianni
13W–35L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Virginia Dailey
26W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.