Teams

OC LLW Great Park Joleen

2023 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC Women WD 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesJill Hauk / Sayuri Maruna vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-26vs OC The Huntington Club - JoWon 10
W#3 DoublesMadeleine Clyde / Denise Vallin-Corona vs Rosalinda Fazio / Sarah King7-5, 6-1
2023-06-02vs OC NBTC - DonnaWon 10
W#3 DoublesSayuri Maruna / Robia Scott vs Romy Kirchhoff / Jodie McCollum6-3, 6-3
2023-05-26vs OC LNRC - Gina 1030Split 11
W#1 DoublesSayuri Maruna / Stephanie Tarzia vs Amy Berk / Jaala Zabrocki6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAli Razin / Regina Jacobs vs Jill Moro / Courtney Zani2-6, 6-7
2023-05-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTracy Newman / Denise Vallin-Corona vs Maureen Hensley / Elizabeth Hawkes6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-04-28vs OC Costa Mesa TC- Susie Kim 1030Won 10
W#3 DoublesAli Razin / Regina Jacobs vs Karla Padova / Brittany Nevins6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Miho Mori
published
3.88
Sayuri Maruna
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Luna Qingyue Cai
published
3.83
Claudia Batlle
published 4
3.81
Denise Vallin-Corona
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Stephanie Tarzia
published
Bonnie Lee
published 4
3.70
Jill Hauk
published
3.61
Jackelinne Bartel
published
3.60
Regina Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Erin Kelley
published
Kerri Husbands
published
Lily Chapin
published
Madeleine Clyde
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Jacobs + Sayuri Maruna314 matchesnot enough data
Jill Hauk + Luna Qingyue Cai123 matchesnot enough data
Sayuri Maruna + Denise Vallin-Corona213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miho Mori
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Sayuri Maruna
90W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
Luna Qingyue Cai
10W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Claudia Batlle
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Denise Vallin-Corona
91W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Stephanie Tarzia
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.78
4
Bonnie Lee
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Hauk
19W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.70
Jackelinne Bartel
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Regina Jacobs
71W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
Erin Kelley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kerri Husbands
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lily Chapin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Madeleine Clyde
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.