Teams

MBlake-TOCH

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Eve

13 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-31vs CKing.5.5C-SVCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLiza Terll / Meredith Bazemore vs Janna Hess / Laura Gallaher2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJamie Scaglione / Hanna Porter vs Cheryl Molinatto / Elischa Dessalines2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeghan Blake / Katy McReynolds vs Chrissy King / Alison Moseley4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-24vs EMcMurtrey.5.5C-DURLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Laros / Meredith Bazemore vs Erin McMurtrey / Ciara Coughlin6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLiza Terll / Kait Mckee vs Shay Cheng / Xian Zhang3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDelisa Ordronneau / Holly Baker vs Alexandra Ferrari / Kelly Conklin3-6, 4-6
2026-08-17vs LKane-DURSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJamie Scaglione / Katy McReynolds vs Lena Basta / Courtney Van Houtven4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMeghan Blake / Kait Mckee vs Sabrina Kane / Rachna Patel5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Ann Laros
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Liza Terll
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Delisa Ordronneau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Meghan Blake
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Jamie Scaglione
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.73
Lori Salzmann
published 3
2.69
Cecilia Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Meredith Bazemore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.42
Katy McReynolds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.19
Holly Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Hanna Porter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.10
Julie Roland
published
1.91
Kait Mckee
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Delisa Ordronneau + Meghan Blake6262% games−0.3% vs expected
Ann Laros + Liza Terll9754% games−0.5% vs expected
Lori Salzmann + Katy McReynolds0533% gamesnot enough data
Delisa Ordronneau + Liza Terll314 matchesnot enough data
Delisa Ordronneau + Katy McReynolds314 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Bazemore + Liza Terll134 matchesnot enough data
Delisa Ordronneau + Meredith Bazemore123 matchesnot enough data
Ann Laros + Meredith Bazemore303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Laros
47W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Liza Terll
76W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Delisa Ordronneau
31W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Meghan Blake
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Jamie Scaglione
27W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Lori Salzmann
15W–25L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Cecilia Gonzales
49W–89L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
2.5
Meredith Bazemore
25W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
2.5
Katy McReynolds
22W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
2.5
Holly Baker
0W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Hanna Porter
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Julie Roland
7W–18L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Kait Mckee
4W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.