Teams

LATA18/Stitely/RC

2022 Adult 18 & Over - USTA · Adult Men - 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRocco del Priore / Adam Smith vs Dave Bigg / Shane Caulk7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-29vs LATA18/Robbins/LCTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesZachary Pensa / Adam Smith vs Stan Gooding / Tom Wright5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-15vs LATA18/FUNDERBURK/LCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert William Basinger - (DQ) / Adam Smith vs Kevin Felkel / Baxter Donaldson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-03-01vs LATA18/ESTES/CTFCLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Smith / Rocco del Priore vs Boone Walker / Palmer Keenan1-6, 3-6
2022-02-22vs LATA18/FUNDERBURK/LCCLost 01
L#2 SinglesAdam Smith vs Ely Grote3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Chris Sinegar
published 4
3.80
Tom Bane
published
3.80
Ben Stitely
published 4
Adam Smith
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
David Bialousow
published 4
Ivo Vanderzijpp
published 4
3.64
Mark Wild
published
3.64
MARTIN CATOLICO
published
Jeffrey Anderson
published 3.5
Linden Carroll
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Bane + Chris Sinegar8263% games+7.4% vs expected
Mark Wild + MARTIN CATOLICO213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Sinegar
29W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
Tom Bane
25W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Ben Stitely
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Adam Smith
53W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
David Bialousow
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Ivo Vanderzijpp
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Wild
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
MARTIN CATOLICO
14W–28L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Jeffrey Anderson
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linden Carroll
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ranjith Sundararajan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert William Basinger
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.