Teams

4-DPachtner-DFC

2024 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Weekend

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-05vs 2-TPrinstein-HRLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Kruse / Gail Gardner vs Susan Kokot / Dana Powers3-6, 0-6
2024-09-28vs 3-DBaker-ENOLost 02
L#1 DoublesGwendolen Buhr / Diane Allen vs Sara Knechtel / Kerry Espinola1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDanette Pachtner / Jennifer Hervey vs Johannah Maynor / Debbie Baker2-6, 4-6
2024-09-21vs 1-TEdwards-HSWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Allen / Gwendolen Buhr vs Shira Katsir / Melissa Provost6-3, 6-2
2024-09-14vs 6-LBible-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesTraci Adams / Danette Pachtner vs Loralie Bible / Lucy McMillan5-7, 4-6
2024-09-07vs 7-LBonzani-ENOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDanette Pachtner / Patty Noonan vs Kara Lardinois / Shannon Bartle7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesGwendolen Buhr / Christine Kruse vs Lilie Bonzani / Liz Schaller2-6, 2-6
2024-08-17vs 5-CGonzales-ENOLost 02
L#1 DoublesDanette Pachtner / Joy Kerner vs Kelli Moore / Cecilia Gonzales3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Delorenzo / Gwendolen Buhr vs Emily Ryan / Krissy Dunn4-6, 4-6
2024-08-10vs 2-TPrinstein-HRLost 01
L#3 DoublesDanette Pachtner / Jennifer Hervey vs Marie-Louise Russ / Eniko Nagy4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.71
Danette Pachtner
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.51
Gwendolen Buhr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.48
Patty Noonan
published
2.27
Traci Adams
published
2.19
Christine Kruse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.93
Gail Gardner
published 2.5
Joy Kerner
published
Sonali Advani
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Kerner + Danette Pachtner303 matchesnot enough data
Danette Pachtner + Christine Kruse123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Danette Pachtner
32W–36L career · 8 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Gwendolen Buhr
14W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
2.51
Patty Noonan
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
Traci Adams
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Christine Kruse
17W–60L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Gail Gardner
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Joy Kerner
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sonali Advani
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.