Teams

Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.0W AM

20 players · average NTRP 4.04 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-02vs Sunpro-Harlan/MortensenWon 30
W#1 DoublesTyra Cook / Shelli Johnston vs Carolyn Andrus / Staci Leishman3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBelinda Jensen / Tena Maughan vs Nan Black / Tamara Miller6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Christensen / Jill Ford vs Denise Daniels / Kelly Mortensen6-2, 6-2
2022-05-26vs Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/HronekWon 41
W#1 DoublesTyra Cook / Pam Ollivier vs Rosa McGuire / Nicole Mills1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle McGill vs Joanna Larsen6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrenda Fowler / Andrea Smith vs Angie Neuberger / Lynn Russo6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTiffany Olson vs Carly Reese3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHalli Craft / Sherilyn Rawlings vs Katri Koehle / Lindsey Ramage6-4, 6-2
2022-05-19vs Sports Mall-WarnerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKathleen Covey / Karen Christensen vs Kandice Taylor / Allison Rideout0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle McGill vs Sara Pinsoneault0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBelinda Jensen / Tena Maughan vs Teisa Linscott / Holli Turner6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShelli Johnston / Jill Ford vs Merri Gillespie / Andrea Kehl6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-12vs RISE AC-Johnson/CahoonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrenda Fowler / Andrea Smith vs Michele Halls / Mindy Thomas1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLisa Mayberry vs Nancy Skidmore7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Ainge / Tiffany Olson vs Becky Thompson / Sara Johnson5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShelli Johnston / Pam Ollivier vs Stacey Cahoon / Rosemary Glines6-7, 6-7
2022-05-05vs Sports Mall-Romney/AdamsonWon 40
W#1 DoublesTyra Cook / Shelli Johnston vs Terry Miya / Carolee Romney6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCambria Cook vs Maggie Rios6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Christensen / Halli Craft vs Julie Jones / Ann Trentman6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Ainge / Kim Santiago vs Sandy Adamson / Nicole Cramer5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-28vs Sunpro-Harlan/MortensenWon 41
W#1 DoublesPam Ollivier / Tyra Cook vs Staci Leishman / Carolyn Andrus6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCambria Cook vs Amy Handley6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJill Ford / Tena Maughan vs Nan Black / DeeAnn Edwards2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLisa Mayberry vs Leslie Jenkins6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBelinda Jensen / Kathleen Covey vs Tamara Miller / Kristi Parker7-6, 7-5
2022-04-21vs Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/HronekWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaren Christensen / Andrea Smith vs Kalee King / Rachel Labrum6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle McGill vs Joanna Larsen6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTiffany Olson / Lisa Mayberry vs Rina Benson / Lynn Russo5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Ainge / Halli Craft vs Angie Neuberger / Carly Reese7-5, 6-4
2022-04-14Won 30
W#2 DoublesBelinda Jensen / Tena Maughan vs Merri Gillespie / Holli Turner6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesCambria Cook vs Elizabeth Vigil6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrenda Fowler / Lisa Mayberry vs Alex Gempeler / Teisa Linscott6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cambria Cook
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.87
Belinda Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
Tyra Cook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Taylor Kirk
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.78
Lisa Mayberry
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.74
Kim Santiago
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 4
3.72
Tiffany Olson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.72
Michelle Ainge
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Sherilyn Rawlings
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.65
Jill Ford
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Andrea Smith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Michelle McGill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.60
Tena Maughan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Brenda Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Shelli Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Halli Craft
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Karen Christensen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kathleen Covey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Pam Ollivier
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Smith + Karen Christensen4261% games+16.9% vs expected
Sherilyn Rawlings + Jill Ford6159% games+13.5% vs expected
Tiffany Olson + Brenda Fowler8356% games+10.2% vs expected
Tena Maughan + Andrea Smith3360% games+9.4% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Lisa Mayberry3360% games+8.0% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Kim Santiago10855% games+6.0% vs expected
Andrea Smith + Shelli Johnston11753% games+4.8% vs expected
Halli Craft + Kim Santiago4158% games+4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cambria Cook
32W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Belinda Jensen
150W–92L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Tyra Cook
43W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
Taylor Kirk
80W–14L career · 10 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Lisa Mayberry
80W–81L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Kim Santiago
151W–88L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Tiffany Olson
115W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Michelle Ainge
54W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Sherilyn Rawlings
136W–64L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Jill Ford
86W–60L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Andrea Smith
77W–50L career · 3 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Michelle McGill
56W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.62
4
Tena Maughan
87W–84L career · 4 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Brenda Fowler
87W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Shelli Johnston
113W–105L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Halli Craft
62W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.41
4
Valerie Blackhurst
71W–54L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.40
Karen Christensen
37W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Covey
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pam Ollivier
67W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.