Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Gannaway

2021 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 4.0M

5 players · average NTRP 3.75 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-10-30vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-CreerSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTaylor Blake vs Ryan Fyfe6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNate McOmber / Kirk Cerise vs Todd Hills / Akio Tsujino3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-10-23vs Wasatch Hills - AtkinLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatrick Gannaway / Michael Nelson vs James Watson / Brady Rasmussen0-6, 3-6
2021-10-16vs Salt Lake Tennis-HolbrookLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Nelson / Nate McOmber vs Simon Blundell / Chad Hemingway1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Gannaway / Arnab Mitra vs David Prier / Chris Manning2-6, 1-6
2021-10-09vs Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/DenhalterLost 01
L#1 DoublesKirk Cerise / Patrick Gannaway vs Abel Thompson / Harrison Radgowski2-6, 2-6
2021-10-02vs Sports Mall-SoaresLost 01
L#2 DoublesKirk Cerise / Michael Nelson vs TROY GRANGER / Lee Spiegel5-7, 4-6
2021-09-25vs Cottonwood Club-NashSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTaylor Blake vs Chris Terry6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPatrick Gannaway / Michael Nelson vs David Min / Joseph Nash2-6, 4-6
2021-09-18vs Sports Mall-GreeneLost 01
L#1 DoublesArnab Mitra / Nate McOmber vs Nathan Widerburg / Bode Widerburg2-6, 1-6
2021-08-28vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-WhiteWon 10
W#1 DoublesTaylor Blake / Michael Olson vs Luke Wolfe / Jason McNeill6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 4.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wasatch Hills - Atkin6218617175
2Cottonwood Club-Nash53131124178
3Salt Lake Tennis-Holbrook53141024187
4CMTA @ Liberty Park-Creer44101431235
5Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/Denhalter35121225211
6Sports Mall-Soares2681632233
7Salt Lake Tennis-Gannaway0861840259

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Taylor Blake
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Nate McOmber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Kirk Cerise
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Olson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Patrick Gannaway
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Olson + Taylor Blake4153% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Gannaway + Nate McOmber224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Taylor Blake
55W–31L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Nate McOmber
61W–47L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kirk Cerise
6W–20L career · 3 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.03
Michael Olson
27W–40L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Patrick Gannaway
10W–34L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.