Teams

Tri Orange Smash

2024 Anne Arundel Tri-Level 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.11 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-09-21vs ANNE ARUNDEL - ArnoldLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Huntington / Kaye Witting vs Jennifer Baldwin / Kim Reed3-6, 1-6
2024-09-19vs BaldwinLost 02
L#2 DoublesAllie Hildebrand / Erin Weller vs Tosha Clark / Ann Harrison3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBetsy Morris / Sara Batouli vs Jocelyn McDaniel / Kelly Vinopal3-6, 6-7
2024-09-15vs DanielsLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarol Dress / Teresa Russin vs Carolyn Noe / Julie Webster5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesErin Weller / Allie Hildebrand vs Brenae Fadden / Erin Kendlehart1-6, 2-6
2024-09-11vs BaldwinWon 10
W#1 DoublesTina Rohm / Kaye Witting vs Lisa Mulholland / Kimberly Keller6-2, 6-3
2024-09-07vs Lady Strikers TriSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTeresa Russin / Kaye Witting vs Yngrid Sierra / Kimberly Walko1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSadie Simpson / Allie Hildebrand vs Aklil Getachew / Kelly Kennedy6-4, 6-4
2024-08-24vs DanielsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJill Huntington / Kaye Witting vs Heather Nesti / Bridget Kelly6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSadie Simpson / Erin Weller vs Meg Daniels / Pamela Nieva6-4, 6-3
2024-08-13vs Lady Breakers TriLost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Herman / Sara Batouli vs Francesca Dougherty / Stephanie Baker1-6, 2-6
2024-07-31vs DanielsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Dress / Allie Hildebrand vs Bridget Kelly / Nicole Gownley6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-27vs Lady Strikers TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesTeresa Russin / Tina Rohm vs Kimberly Walko / Fabiola Custodio6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Tina Rohm
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Teresa Russin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Allie Hildebrand
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Jill Huntington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
Liz Neeser
published
2.98
Kaye Witting
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Emily Trochimowicz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.94
Marilyn Moore
published
2.85
Erin Weller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Jessica Myers
published
2.51
Sara Batouli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.38
Kim Herman
published
2.32
Betsy Morris
published 2.5
Melisa Steffens
published
STEPHANIE MILLARD
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Trochimowicz + Allie Hildebrand123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tina Rohm
130W–98L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Teresa Russin
52W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Allie Hildebrand
47W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
3
Jill Huntington
206W–137L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.15
Liz Neeser
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Kaye Witting
66W–87L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Emily Trochimowicz
103W–112L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
2.96
Marilyn Moore
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Erin Weller
41W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
Jessica Myers
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
2.5
Sara Batouli
26W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%46%54%
2.51
Kim Herman
2W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Betsy Morris
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
Melisa Steffens
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
STEPHANIE MILLARD
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.