Teams

Greenhill/Weidlich-Caldwell W4.5S

2024 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Sunday · W4.5S

20 players · average NTRP 4.56 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for W4.5S have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Heather Presley
published 5
4.45
Sonia Moorthy
published
4.43
Celesta Caldwell
published 4.5
4.40
Beth Quint
published 4.5
4.40
Holly Kerr
published 4.5
4.39
Melanie Finnegan
published
4.38
Eri Matsumoto
published 4.5
4.35
Melissa Walters
published
4.23
Brooke Cabianca
published 4.5
4.22
Laurie Reinhardt
published
4.22
Brooke Hodnick
published 4.5
4.14
Erin Piel
published 4.5
4.11
Jody Hassemer
published
4.10
Val Weidlich
published
4.09
Shana Lazarine
published
4.06
Jackie Reily
published 4.5
4.06
Sue Mowery
published
4.01
Lynne Wakeland
published
Kate Poplin Ikeda
published
Sallie Canan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sonia Moorthy + Melanie Finnegan7560% games+4.9% vs expected
Brooke Hodnick + Jody Hassemer4256% games−2.0% vs expected
Lynne Wakeland + Laurie Reinhardt3250% gamesnot enough data
Brooke Cabianca + Jody Hassemer404 matchesnot enough data
Sonia Moorthy + Holly Kerr314 matchesnot enough data
Celesta Caldwell + Val Weidlich134 matchesnot enough data
Celesta Caldwell + Melanie Finnegan314 matchesnot enough data
Val Weidlich + Eri Matsumoto314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Heather Presley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
4.47
Sonia Moorthy
37W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
4.45
4.5
Celesta Caldwell
32W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Beth Quint
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.40
4.5
Holly Kerr
18W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.40
Melanie Finnegan
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Eri Matsumoto
23W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
4.38
Melissa Walters
37W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Brooke Cabianca
38W–19L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
Laurie Reinhardt
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Brooke Hodnick
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Erin Piel
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
4.14
Jody Hassemer
30W–17L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.11
Val Weidlich
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.10
Shana Lazarine
26W–13L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Jackie Reily
25W–29L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
Sue Mowery
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
Lynne Wakeland
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
4.01
Kate Poplin Ikeda
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sallie Canan
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.