Teams

HIT OR MISS

2021 Adult 18 and Over League · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-27vs TOO KAWAIIWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Iida / Rebecca Marshall vs Karen Dodo / Christine Gumbs6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNina Sabahi vs Darnella Villanueva0-1
W#2 DoublesGloria Gomez / Midori Matsuo vs Mary Borer / Maya Kondo6-3, 6-4
2021-06-15vs TOO KAWAIIWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Iida / Midori Matsuo vs Darnella Villanueva / Maya Kondo6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRebecca Marshall vs Christine Gumbs6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGloria Gomez / Barbara Taniguchi vs Mary Borer / Niko Gagne1-6, 3-6
2021-05-30vs TOO KAWAIILost 12
W#1 DoublesRebecca Marshall / Emma Pedro vs Christine Gumbs / Karen Dodo6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJulie Iida vs Darnella Villanueva4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMidori Matsuo / Barbara Taniguchi vs Niko Gagne / Mary Borer5-7, 1-6
2021-05-26vs TOO KAWAIIWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmma Pedro / Gloria Gomez vs Mary Borer / Maya Kondo6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNina Sabahi vs Kira Mae4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMidori Matsuo / Rebecca Marshall vs Karen Dodo / Darnella Villanueva6-1, 6-2
2021-05-23vs TOO KAWAIILost 12
W#1 DoublesBarbara Taniguchi / Julie Iida vs Maya Kondo / Karen Dodo7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesEmma Pedro vs Christine Gumbs2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGloria Gomez / Midori Matsuo vs Mary Borer / Darnella Villanueva3-6, 2-6
2021-05-06vs TOO KAWAIIWon 21
L#1 DoublesGloria Gomez / Genie Nagata vs Mary Borer / Darnella Villanueva4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJulie Iida vs Kira Mae6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Marshall / Barbara Taniguchi vs Christine Gumbs / Karen Dodo6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Midori Matsuo
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Emma Pedro
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.65
Rebecca Marshall
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Gloria Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.16
Jane Iida
published 2.5
Julie Iida
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
Nina Sabahi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Midori Matsuo
32W–12L career · 5 lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
2.93
3
Emma Pedro
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rebecca Marshall
43W–61L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65
2.5
Gloria Gomez
16W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
2.5
Jane Iida
35W–62L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Julie Iida
31W–63L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nina Sabahi
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.