Teams

Willow Oaks 6.0 Matawaran

2025 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 6.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-07vs Kanawha SixMix - WareWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlex Burnett / Catherine Matawaran vs Marty Edwards / Jon Czyszczon2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTroy Kingsbury / Kelly Beazley vs Tiffany Clarke / Jared Dunn2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCraig Sampson / Francesca Purcell vs Jonathan Kaufmann / Lindsay Daniel0-6, 4-6
2025-07-07vs Honey Badgers MTC - CutlipLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeff Hamlin / Kristin Hamlin vs Lakshmi Prasanna Chary Yaddanapudi / Candice Duncan2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRaymond Cargill / Zinie Sampson vs Mark Beattie / Allie Hannon2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesByron Chafin / Anne Scher vs William Cutlip / Amanda Biringer6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-18vs HCC ThompsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlex Burnett / Jennifer Burris vs Stuart Thompson / Meredith Thompson3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRyan Frei / Emily Kennedy vs Christopher Forstner / Harjit Vohra7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Hamlin / Kristin Hamlin vs Ted Jurkuta / Savon Sampson1-6, 4-6
2025-06-13vs Burkwood-Brock-MohsLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Burris / Charles Christianson vs Kimberly Garrett / Andrew Powell5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Hamlin / Byron Chafin vs Tori Hylton / Andrew Hylton2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Scher / Hank Heyming vs Melissa Brock / Ryan Mohs6-3, 6-3
2025-06-02vs 6.0 Sherdel-RMCLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Kennedy / Jim Kennedy vs Richard Botha / Judith McGarrity1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJuliet Dagostino / Alex Burnett vs Sherry Elliott / William Sapon6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesHank Heyming / Francesca Purcell vs Nicholas Arcaro / Tina Carter1-6, 4-6
2025-05-23vs ACAC TownsendWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Kennedy / Jim Kennedy vs Lori Strobl / John Mulligan6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Burris / Charles Christianson vs Cecilia Bergh / Christopher Kandl4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Scher / Raymond Cargill vs Kim Martin / Dan Norfolk6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Jennifer Burris
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Ryan Frei
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Zinie Sampson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Alex Burnett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Troy Kingsbury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Charles Christianson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Byron Chafin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Kelly Beazley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Emily Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Hank Heyming
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Kristin Hamlin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Jeff Hamlin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Jim Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Anne Scher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Francesca Purcell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Raymond Cargill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Catherine Matawaran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Craig Sampson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Mary Scott Swanson
published
2.63
2.53
Juliet Dagostino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Hamlin + Jeff Hamlin3257% gamesnot enough data
Jim Kennedy + Emily Kennedy314 matchesnot enough data
Anne Scher + Ryan Frei213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Burris
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Ryan Frei
20W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Zinie Sampson
15W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Alex Burnett
35W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Troy Kingsbury
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Charles Christianson
18W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Byron Chafin
19W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Kelly Beazley
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Emily Kennedy
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
Hank Heyming
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Kristin Hamlin
17W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Jeff Hamlin
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Jim Kennedy
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Anne Scher
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Francesca Purcell
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Raymond Cargill
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Catherine Matawaran
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Craig Sampson
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Mary Scott Swanson
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Colette Christianson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Juliet Dagostino
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.