Teams

EFSC - Archer

2026 Brevard Adult 18 & Over Early Start · 2.5 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-17vs Kiwi - KonradLost 12
L#1 DoublesVida Zou / Calli Ohlin vs Katey Benne / Pam Mcfadden0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBrianna Stevens vs Stacy Konrad1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJenna Bajus / Elizabeth Thorne vs Emily Burke / Dana Chesser6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-16vs Kiwanis - WoodsLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniella Archer / Jenna Bajus vs Eileen Bentley / Jenifer Raymond1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCalli Ohlin vs Michelle Kne0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMackenzie Sloan / Vida Zou vs Cheryl Toth / Joanne Ludwig4-6, 1-6
2025-11-12vs Kiwi - KonradLost 03
L#1 DoublesJenna Bajus / Mackenzie Sloan vs Lisa Sexton / Donna Ford4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCalli Ohlin vs Morgan Anderson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVida Zou / Gabriella Collura vs Summer Moses / Emily Burke2-6, 3-6
2025-10-22vs Kiwanis - WoodsLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniella Archer / Brianna Stevens vs Eileen Bentley / Julie Thalen1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCalli Ohlin vs Cheryl Toth0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJenna Bajus / Elizabeth Thorne vs Jenifer Raymond / Anna Marie Pippett1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 1.94 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.31
Vida Zou
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Gabriella Collura
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.02
Jenna Bajus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.98
Mackenzie Sloan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.87
Calli Ohlin
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.86
Elizabeth Thorne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.81
Daniella Archer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.74
Brianna Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Calli Ohlin + Brianna Stevens033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vida Zou
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Gabriella Collura
0W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jenna Bajus
1W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Mackenzie Sloan
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
2.5
Calli Ohlin
0W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
2.5
Elizabeth Thorne
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86
2.5
Daniella Archer
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.81
2.5
Brianna Stevens
0W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.