Teams

KY/LOU/GOSELIN

2025 USTA SINGLES 18 & OVER · 4.5 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-28vs KY/LOU/HOSTETLERLost 12
L#1 SinglesPaige Gracin vs Hannah Hostetler2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesSandra Meyerowitz vs Sara DeSanctis6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRebekkah Rechter vs Sarah Kane-Liu0-6, 2-6
2025-08-20vs KY/LOU/ACKERMANNLost 12
L#1 SinglesJennifer Goselin vs Carmen Schreiber6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAmanda Rassiga vs Rose Shuck0-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesRebekkah Rechter vs Rhonda Arnold3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-04vs KY/LOU/HOSTETLERLost 03
L#1 SinglesSandra Meyerowitz vs Sara DeSanctis1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Keith vs Tracey Risk5-7, 0-3
L#3 SinglesBounthavy Hill vs Amanda Maddox0-6, 0-6
2025-07-31vs KY/LOU/ACKERMANNLost 03
L#1 SinglesPaige Gracin vs Carmen Schreiber2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesLaura Gaviglio vs Noel Kaufmann2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesAmanda Rassiga vs Rhonda Arnold4-6, 5-7
2025-07-15vs KY/LOU/HOSTETLERWon 21
L#1 SinglesJennifer Goselin vs Sara DeSanctis2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesBounthavy Hill vs Grace Bates3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAndi Ramser vs Tracey Risk6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-07vs KY/LOU/ACKERMANNLost 12
L#1 SinglesPaige Gracin vs Rose Shuck1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSandra Meyerowitz vs Carmen Schreiber3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesLaura Gaviglio vs Rhonda Arnold6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Jennifer Goselin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.17
Paige Gracin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.04
Sarah Keith
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.75
Andi Ramser
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.71
Sandra Meyerowitz
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.63
Laura Gaviglio
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.59
Amanda Rassiga
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.59
Rebekkah Rechter
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.52
Bounthavy Hill
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Goselin
24W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Paige Gracin
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Sarah Keith
17W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.04
4
Andi Ramser
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Sandra Meyerowitz
10W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Laura Gaviglio
14W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.63
4
Amanda Rassiga
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Rebekkah Rechter
16W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
4
Bounthavy Hill
17W–31L career · 8 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.