Teams

Andresen - PCC

2024 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.92 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesDawn Marino / Valerie Wilson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-12-04vs Bryan - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Andresen / Jena Wise vs Abigail Nelson / Thuy Nguyen2-6, 4-6
2024-11-20vs Kreis - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Andresen / Dawn Marino vs Mecy Wimberly / Chelsea Simpson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-18vs Anderson - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesJena Wise / Lisa Andresen vs Julie Papalardo / Sam Richardson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-11-09vs Escambia/Marsach/18&Over7.5WWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Andresen / Amanda Brown vs Ive Marsach / Maria Hicks3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesGrace Allen / Natalie Mcelhany vs Jennifer Jackson / Beata Antal6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnsli Brown / Alycia Esmonde vs Melanie DiLoreto / KIMBERLY ANDREWS6-2, 6-3
2024-10-23vs Bryan - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Andresen / Dawn Marino vs Abigail Nelson / Brooklyn Meadows2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alycia Esmonde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Carly Russell
published 4
Grace Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Lisa Andresen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Natalie Mcelhany
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Amanda Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Dawn Marino
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Jena Wise
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Valerie Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ansli Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Mandy Blair
published
Tanya Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alycia Esmonde
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Carly Russell
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Grace Allen
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Andresen
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.63
Natalie Mcelhany
29W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.62
4
Amanda Brown
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Dawn Marino
69W–111L career · 3 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
Jena Wise
38W–96L career · 2 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.44
Valerie Wilson
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Ansli Brown
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Mandy Blair
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tanya Hughes
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.