Teams

2-LGilchrist-CHCC 5.5

2023 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Day

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-21vs 1-JOregan-HR 5.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKara Andrews / Lucy Leach vs Jodi Preminger / Rachel Hawkins5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2023-09-14vs 1-JOregan-HR 5.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMarci Hansen / Julie Myers vs Abigail Hatcher / Barbie McGarrah6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKara Andrews / Denise Kennihan vs Jodi Preminger / Marie Chamblee4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-09-07vs 3-LKindem-UNCLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarci Hansen / Julie Myers vs Kelly Johnson / Anne Heymann2-6, 1-6
2023-08-31vs 4-ACombs-CCC 5.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Briner / Kara Andrews vs Thuy Brooks / Teresa Ritter3-6, 1-6
2023-08-24vs 1-JOregan-HR 5.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesKara Andrews / Justine Zavaglia vs Janice Ross / Abigail Hatcher6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Marci Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Kathryn Chan
published
2.84
Cherreka Kiel
published 3
2.83
Laura Porter
published
2.77
Linda Gilchrist
published
2.75
Justine Zavaglia
published
2.48
Kara Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.25
Leslye Rood
published
Anita Cook
published 2.5
Gillian Mishalko
published
Lucy Leach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Gilchrist + Laura Porter134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Marci Hansen
51W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
2.99
Kathryn Chan
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Cherreka Kiel
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
Laura Porter
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Linda Gilchrist
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Justine Zavaglia
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Kara Andrews
8W–51L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.48
Leslye Rood
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
2.25
2.5
Anita Cook
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Gillian Mishalko
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lucy Leach
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.