Teams

3 Belmont Berens

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-05vs 4 MRTC Williams 4.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesJenny Murray / Allyson Brand vs Rebecca Loos / Bindhya Rusu-Mehes6-0, 6-1
2023-06-03vs 1 Southampton LaneWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenny Murray / Allyson Brand vs Michelle Holmes / Karolyn Hall1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJackie Berens vs Karna Hyman6-1, 6-3
2023-05-27vs 2 Belmont Greiner/AngelWon 20
W#2 SinglesJackie Berens vs Mindy Angel6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJenny Murray / Allyson Brand vs Courtney Greiner / Monika Peets6-1, 6-2
2023-05-20vs 1 Southampton LaneWon 20
W#2 SinglesJackie Berens vs Nevena Arsic4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Gregory / Margie Ray vs Cherie Lane / Suzanne Spiller6-2, 2-1
2023-05-06vs 2 Belmont Greiner/AngelWon 20
W#1 DoublesLindsey Genter / Margie Ray vs Beth Robbins / Tamara Beck Jacquet7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJackie Berens vs Delaney Rhodus6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-29vs 1 Southampton LaneLost 02
L#1 SinglesJackie Berens vs Tatiane Restani2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJenny Murray / Allyson Brand vs Kim Alley / Karolyn Hall0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-04-22vs 4 MRTC Williams 4.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Berens / Logan Stone vs Irina Schaffernoth / Rebecca Loos6-1, 6-3
2023-04-15vs 2 Belmont Greiner/AngelWon 10
W#1 SinglesJackie Berens vs April Kim6-3, 6-1
2023-04-08vs 4 MRTC Williams 4.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Gregory / Margie Ray vs Lucinda Stuckey / Kristin Tetterton6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.82
Clara Laing
published 5
4.78
Blake Goldsmith
published 5
4.63
Jenny Murray
published
4.41
Jackie Berens
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4.5
4.40
Logan Stone
published
Allyson Brand
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Anna Shea
published 4.5
4.25
Cary Moore
published 4.5
4.23
Margie Ray
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Elizabeth Kelly
published
3.85
Carol Gregory
published 4.5
3.77
Jill Campbell
published
3.48
Lindsey Howard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clara Laing + Lindsey Howard303 matchesnot enough data
Allyson Brand + Margie Ray123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Clara Laing
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.82
5
Blake Goldsmith
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.78
Jenny Murray
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.63
4.5
Jackie Berens
89W–50L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
4.41
Logan Stone
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
4.40
4.5
Allyson Brand
25W–22L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Anna Shea
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Cary Moore
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Margie Ray
93W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Elizabeth Kelly
35W–21L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Carol Gregory
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.85
Jill Campbell
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.77
Lindsey Howard
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
3.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.