Teams

Stay Local

2026 WY Tri-Level · Jackson Women 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.57 / WYOMING

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesTami DeGrosky / Alexa Halaby vs Kristina Peterson / Miranda Hoover7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Brennan / Lindsay Brandenburg vs Kelly Milligan / Shelby Johnson-sapp4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Schuler / Suzanne Matthews vs Suzanne Thomas / Robin Keeler3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesTami DeGrosky / Lynette Krause vs Miranda Hoover / Kristina Peterson2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Brennan / Cathleen French vs Kelly Milligan / Shelby Johnson-sapp3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Schuler / Suzanne Matthews vs Suzanne Thomas / Robin Keeler4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesLynette Krause / Alexa Halaby vs Miranda Hoover / Kristina Peterson4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCathleen French / Stephanie Brennan vs Shelby Johnson-sapp / Emily Kirk4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Schuler / Suzanne Matthews vs Sallie Felton / Robin Keeler2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAlexa Halaby / Lynette Krause vs Miranda Hoover / Kristina Peterson1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLindsay Brandenburg / Stephanie Brennan vs Emily Kirk / Shelby Johnson-sapp3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Schuler / Suzanne Matthews vs Robin Keeler / Sallie Felton2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAlexa Halaby / Lynette Krause vs Miranda Hoover / Kristina Peterson2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Brandenburg / Cathleen French vs Kelly Milligan / Emily Kirk4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Schuler / Suzanne Matthews vs Suzanne Thomas / Sallie Felton4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Jackson Women 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Lynette Krause
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Alexa Halaby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Tami DeGrosky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Cathleen French
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Lindsay Brandenburg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Anne Schuler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.07
Suzanne Matthews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Stephanie Brennan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Schuler + Suzanne Matthews0536% games−7.6% vs expected
Alexa Halaby + Lynette Krause033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lynette Krause
1W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Alexa Halaby
1W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45
4
Tami DeGrosky
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Cathleen French
2W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Lindsay Brandenburg
0W–8L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3
Anne Schuler
0W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
3
Suzanne Matthews
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
Stephanie Brennan
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.