Teams

Overstreet/Memphis

2025 Mixed 55 & Over - Memphis · 4.0 Mixed 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-27vs Hayes/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Schuler / Katharine Schuler vs Laura Hollis-Talley / Timothy Clements7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesEva Farris / Dixon Stuart vs Paul Woods / Ally Boggan6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Overstreet / Missy Gulick vs William Pettit / Jennifer Magee6-2, 6-4
2025-07-20vs Hayes/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Overstreet / Carol Casey vs Kevin Hayes / Debbie Walker-Hulette6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Kam / Dena Mullen vs Ally Boggan / William Stine2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesXuezhong Li / Shannon Seay vs Laura Hollis-Talley / Timothy Clements3-6, 6-7
2025-07-13vs Hayes/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesDena Mullen / Bin Li vs Timothy Myrick / Dee Pitawanakwat4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesXuezhong Li / Shannon Seay vs Debbie Walker-Hulette / Paul Woods5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMissy Gulick / Dixon Stuart vs Jennifer Magee / William Pettit6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-29vs Hayes/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesXuezhong Li / Shannon Seay vs Stacey Hyde / Joe Johnson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBin Li / Katharine Schuler vs Laura Hollis-Talley / William Stine6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Casey / David Kam vs Kevin Hayes / Dee Pitawanakwat7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-14vs Hayes/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesXuezhong Li / Eva Farris vs Laura Hollis-Talley / Timothy Clements7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Kam / Missy Gulick vs Joe Johnson / Ally Boggan6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDena Mullen / John Mullen vs Jennifer Magee / Timothy Myrick7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-01vs Hayes/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesBin Li / Shannon Seay vs Paul Woods / Dee Pitawanakwat1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Overstreet / Missy Gulick vs Stacey Hyde / Joe Johnson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Casey / Dixon Stuart vs William Stine / Lil Rudd6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 Mixed 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Overstreet/Memphis3381023184

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Xuezhong Li
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.80
David Kam
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Carol Casey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Dixon Stuart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Katharine Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Missy Gulick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Shannon Seay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
David Overstreet
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Dena Mullen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Eva Farris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
John Mullen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Seay + Xuezhong Li2450% gamesnot enough data
Missy Gulick + David Overstreet213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Xuezhong Li
15W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
David Kam
32W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Carol Casey
15W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Dixon Stuart
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katharine Schuler
40W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Missy Gulick
64W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Shannon Seay
23W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
David Overstreet
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Dena Mullen
24W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Eva Farris
42W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
John Mullen
16W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mark Schuler
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.