Teams

JFulcomer (Southampton)

2025 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 7.5 Men - Tues PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-14vs RLinder/Polacek (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 DoublesScott Davis / MARK TERRIO vs Roger Gum / Thomas Hull6-3, 6-3
2025-10-07vs DBrantmeyer (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesBo Chriscoe / David Shuman vs Hector Tovar / Brian Hartzog7-5, 6-1
2025-09-30vs RPietrykowski (PPRSC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesScott Davis / MARK TERRIO vs Andrew Ross / Tom Stapleton6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBo Chriscoe / Don Miller vs Rich Pietrykowski / Chris McIver6-1, 6-2
2025-09-23vs MGriffey (WSRC)Won 20
W#2 DoublesVince Quinn / MARK TERRIO vs Richard Teat / Peter Sofarelli7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Fulcomer / Aaron Backus vs Joseph Dichak / Michael Rousseaux6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-09-09vs RLinder/Polacek (Life Time)Won 10
W#3 DoublesBo Chriscoe / David Shuman vs Scott King / Leonard Brecken6-4, 6-2
2025-09-02vs DBrantmeyer (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesBo Chriscoe / Aaron Backus vs Mike Ferguson / Todd Kasler6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-26vs RPietrykowski (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Lucas / MARK TERRIO vs Ken Griffin / Kent Franks4-6, 1-6
2025-08-19vs MGriffey (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Fulcomer / Aaron Backus vs Kevin Miller / Michael Dorsel6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVince Quinn / MARK TERRIO vs Richard Teat / Peter Sofarelli6-1, 1-2
2025-08-12vs JBlocksom (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAaron Backus / Bo Chriscoe vs Paul Sperry / Allen Ramsey7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 7.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Bo Chriscoe
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.99
Vince Quinn
published
3.76
Jeffrey Fulcomer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Joseph Gann
published
3.63
MARK TERRIO
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.54
Brian Steffey
published 4
3.40
Giles Beal
published
3.36
Al Kadar
published 3.5
3.18
Aaron Backus
published 3.5
Don Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bo Chriscoe + Vince Quinn9259% games+1.9% vs expected
Bo Chriscoe + Jeffrey Fulcomer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bo Chriscoe
64W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
Vince Quinn
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Jeffrey Fulcomer
42W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Joseph Gann
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
MARK TERRIO
126W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
4
Brian Steffey
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Giles Beal
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Al Kadar
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Aaron Backus
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Don Miller
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.