Teams

Williams Y Muehl

2025 Duval Combo 50 & Over Summer · 8.5 W Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-06vs Boone Park ForcierLost 02
L#2 DoublesMargaret Hicks / Cynthia Haines vs Grace Costello / Eileen Edsall4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesArlene Muehl / Maria Ayala vs Ellen Dyal / Gigi Mulhern4-6, 4-6
2025-08-23vs Duval/ChiuSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCecilia Collins / Cynthia Haines vs Marianne Harper / Vi Sudhipong2-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDarlene Turner / Katie Deering vs Dorothy Chiu / Jill Jabot0-6, 5-7
2025-08-16vs Boone Park ForcierLost 01
L#2 DoublesElaine Ward / Cynthia Haines vs Eileen Edsall / Grace Costello4-6, 1-6
2025-08-02vs Duval/ChiuLost 01
L#1 DoublesElaine Ward / Darlene Turner vs Jill Saig / Lesley Williams1-6, 2-6
2025-07-12vs Duval/ChiuLost 01
L#1 DoublesMargaret Hicks / Darlene Turner vs Cynthia McGehee / Vi Sudhipong4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Cecilia Collins
published 4.5
3.91
Cynthia Haines
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Elaine Ward
published
3.85
Katie Deering
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
3.84
Virginia Watson
published
3.79
Kelly Atkins
published
3.75
Michelle Reid
published
Connie Bones
published 4
3.62
Darlene Turner
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Mani Prieto
published
3.45
Arlene Muehl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Loretta Zubero
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Reid + Cynthia Haines4547% games−2.0% vs expected
Michelle Reid + Mani Prieto213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cecilia Collins
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
4
Cynthia Haines
127W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.91
Elaine Ward
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Katie Deering
85W–68L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
4
Ruth Jones-Looney
93W–65L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Virginia Watson
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Kelly Atkins
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Michelle Reid
18W–17L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Connie Bones
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Darlene Turner
66W–83L career · 6 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Mani Prieto
23W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
3.5
Arlene Muehl
77W–66L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Loretta Zubero
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.