Teams

OP-Watson Netters (55s 4.0W SP)

2026 Neuse River Adult 55 & Over League · 4.0 Women 55 & over

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-28vs BW Mayo/Whitley (4.0 55s W)Won 30
W#1 DoublesDoris Smith / Sherry Hambright vs Sangita Tewari / Michele Mayo6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarsha Pierson / Denise Wells vs Diana Cox / Ann Adams1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRuby Williams / Cheryl Watson vs Azita Movahed / Lorinda Parker6-4, 6-4
2026-04-14vs BW Mayo/Whitley (4.0 55s W)Won 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Garner / Sherry Hambright vs Sangita Tewari / Missy Barrow3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMerry Katherine Glover / Denise Wells vs Diana Cox / Sharon Christian6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarsha Pierson / Kim Alford vs Michele Mayo / Kelly Whitley6-4, 6-2
2026-03-24vs BW Mayo/Whitley (4.0 55s W)Won 30
W#1 DoublesDoris Smith / Stephanie Garner vs Missy Barrow / Michele Mayo6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMerry Katherine Glover / Denise Wells vs Leslie Rogers / Ann Adams6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Ringwalt / Ruby Williams vs Diana Cox / Suzan Martin6-3, 7-6
2026-03-10vs BW Mayo/Whitley (4.0 55s W)Won 21
W#1 DoublesDoris Smith / Stephanie Garner vs Lorinda Parker / Kathy Garren6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLynn Easley / Denise Wells vs Missy Barrow / Michele Mayo2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRuby Williams / Cheryl Watson vs Kelly Whitley / Diana Cox6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 55 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Stephanie Garner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Doris Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Mary Ringwalt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Sherry Hambright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Cheryl Watson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Merry Katherine Glover
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Marsha Pierson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Denise Wells
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Kim Alford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Lynn Easley
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Garner + Doris Smith5075% games+9.8% vs expected
Sherry Hambright + Doris Smith12359% games+6.9% vs expected
Merry Katherine Glover + Stephanie Garner8160% games+3.5% vs expected
Merry Katherine Glover + Denise Wells6164% games−2.1% vs expected
Denise Wells + Doris Smith314 matchesnot enough data
Denise Wells + Lynn Easley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Garner
15W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Doris Smith
23W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
Mary Ringwalt
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Sherry Hambright
15W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Cheryl Watson
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
Merry Katherine Glover
14W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Marsha Pierson
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Denise Wells
17W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Kim Alford
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Lynn Easley
19W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.