Teams

SD 4.0 Mtn View/ Bauer (2:2)

2022 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD · SD - Men - 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 DoublesNicholas Rodrigues / Matt Pearl vs Scott Rath / Andrew Gilcrest7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMark Bauer / Tim Pillow vs M Edelson / Peter Gray3-6, 4-6
2022-03-06vs SD 4.0 SDT&R/ Channick (3:1)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSteve Potter / Eric Contreras vs Scott Atwood / Vijay Desiraju1-6, 1-6
2022-02-27vs SD LLW 4.0 Mtn View/ GalanLost 01
L#2 DoublesJim Kemp / Tim Pillow vs Paul Minifee / Casey Moore4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-02-13vs SD 4.0 Coronado TC/ Kamas (2:2)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMatt Pearl / Nicholas Rodrigues vs Theodore Gilmore / Matthew Paradise6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Potter / Eric Bowers vs Kim Ostermarker / Larry Garberick7-6, 3-0
2022-02-06vs SD 4.0 Coronado TC/ Kamas (2:2)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMatt Pearl / Nicholas Rodrigues vs Alex Fahrenthold / Alexis Akira Toda2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEric Contreras / Steve Potter vs Jeff Harrington / Eric Meschen1-6, 0-6
2022-01-30vs SD 4.0 SDT&R/ Channick (3:1)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Bowers / Steve Potter vs Scott Atwood / Bob Ruane2-6, 2-6
2022-01-23vs SD LLW 4.0 Mtn View/ GalanSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMark Bauer / Steve Potter vs Marco Jimenez / Paul Minifee2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMatt Pearl / Nicholas Rodrigues vs Tybun Ferguson / Stephen Aiken6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDaniel Riding / Nicholas Rodrigues vs David Brumbaugh / Larry Wagner6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobert May / Tim Pillow vs Jess Zlotnik / M Edelson4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Matt Pearl
published
3.97
Eric Bowers
published 4
3.94
Nicholas Rodrigues
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.83
Tim Pillow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Henry Matos
published 4
3.27
Steve Potter
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.21
Daniel Riding
published 3.5
Leonard Loventhal
published
Mark Bauer
published
Robert May
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Bowers + Nicholas Rodrigues314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Pearl
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
4.00
4
Eric Bowers
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Nicholas Rodrigues
44W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Tim Pillow
50W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Henry Matos
9W–21L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Steve Potter
33W–80L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Daniel Riding
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Leonard Loventhal
5W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Bauer
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert May
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.