Teams

Honey Deuces

Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women - Sat

20 players · average NTRP 2.92 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-20vs Sets in the CityWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichele Giacomucci / Teri Riordan vs Ali Cano / Morgan Namian6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMadi Costigan vs Sarah Green6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Smith / E Nicholson vs Judy Stewart / Lisa Nichols6-0, 6-1
2026-06-13vs Delco DollsLost 23
L#1 DoublesMary Crowley / Donna Mill vs Melissa O'Neill / Omar Yard-Caban6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMengyao Niu vs Elizabeth Romaine6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHsin-Yu Ha / Julie Smith vs Kelly Flynn / Lex Brooks6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAimee Gibison vs Christina Larocco6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNishma Martinez / Tracy Vecchiolli vs Susan Rosen / Siobhan Hontz3-6, 4-6
2026-05-30vs GCC 3.0 Ladies 18+Won 41
L#1 DoublesDonna Mill / Teri Riordan vs Beth Ann Robinson / Joan Brong6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMengyao Niu vs Jamie Boschan6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Giacomucci / Hsin-Yu Ha vs Maria McGarry / Oana Vlad6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesNishma Martinez vs Athena Huss6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Kelley / Lynn Erskine vs Elizabeth Ryland / Lauren Carella6-2, 6-4
2026-05-17vs Delco DollsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDonna Mill / Katharine Sharon vs Suzanne Quinn / Kelly Flynn6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Giacomucci / Mengyao Niu vs Preeti Gupta / Mina Kobayashi6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesNishma Martinez vs Omar Yard-Caban1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-05-16vs WSARC Saturday 3.0 TeamWon 40
W#1 DoublesRachel Claire Parisi / Hsin-Yu Ha vs Lindsay Doyle / Danielle Duffy6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Crowley / Katie Grieco vs Kristy Arbogast / Jennifer Nesbitt4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMadi Costigan vs Jaclyn Davis6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Erskine / Mary Pat King vs Bella Dai / Sandra Sloane6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-05-02vs Sets in the CityWon 31
W#1 DoublesKatharine Sharon / Melanie Baunchalk vs Judy Stewart / Morgan Namian6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNishma Martinez vs Aarti Shevade0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Smith / Mary Crowley vs Casie Hartman / Lisa Nichols6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAimee Gibison vs Sarah Green6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-26vs UMLY United LadiesWon 41
W#1 DoublesDonna Mill / Teri Riordan vs Marian Inderelst / Meg Hood6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDeanna Huntowski vs Jackie Berry6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichele Giacomucci / Melanie Baunchalk vs Tina Cappiello / Layla Deleon6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMengyao Niu vs Ekaterina Khudiakova2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Pat King / Tracy Vecchiolli vs Amanda Mattis / Vera Skrydlyak6-2, 6-3
2026-04-18vs Smash SistersLost 04
L#1 DoublesMichele Giacomucci / Rachel Claire Parisi vs Melissa Bereda / Jennifer Ratcliffe3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJulie Smith / Hsin-Yu Ha vs Erika Laidlaw / Vanessa Colley7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMadi Costigan vs Devika Patil6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTracy Vecchiolli / Susan Kelley vs Zyonna Boykin / Pamela Tedesco2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Sat have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Madi Costigan
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.94
Hsin-Yu Ha
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Donna Mill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Rachel Claire Parisi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Deanna Huntowski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.83
Michele Giacomucci
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.81
Mengyao Niu
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.76
Melanie Baunchalk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Lynn Erskine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Nishma Martinez
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.64
Katharine Sharon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Teri Riordan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Mary Pat King
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Mary Crowley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Katie Grieco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Tracy Vecchiolli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Susan Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.20
Aimee Gibison
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
E Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Paige Stocker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Giacomucci + Hsin-Yu Ha5173% games+20.3% vs expected
Michele Giacomucci + Rachel Claire Parisi4166% games+16.9% vs expected
Michele Giacomucci + Katie Grieco3550% games+5.7% vs expected
Mary Crowley + Hsin-Yu Ha5356% games+2.6% vs expected
Tracy Vecchiolli + Susan Kelley1437% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madi Costigan
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Hsin-Yu Ha
57W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Donna Mill
102W–92L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Rachel Claire Parisi
19W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Deanna Huntowski
64W–63L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Michele Giacomucci
98W–113L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Mengyao Niu
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Melanie Baunchalk
92W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Lynn Erskine
42W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
Nishma Martinez
46W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Katharine Sharon
58W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Teri Riordan
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Mary Pat King
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
Mary Crowley
59W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
Katie Grieco
13W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
Tracy Vecchiolli
37W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.45
Susan Kelley
16W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.36
2.5
Aimee Gibison
16W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
E Nicholson
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Paige Stocker
8W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.