Teams

Huffman/Knoxville

2026 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDanielle Kwasnik / Jill Hoschette vs Allison King / Catalina Knutson4-6, 6-7
2026-04-18vs Williams/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bell / Danielle Kwasnik vs Jennifer Lea / Annie Adams6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPatsy Fischer / Jill Hoschette vs Tammy Simpson / Julia Slagle1-6, 2-6
2026-04-11vs King/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#2 SinglesGabriella Rimmer vs Kim Ewing5-7, 1-6
2026-03-28vs Browning/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 SinglesGabriella Rimmer vs Sara Wallingford3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaola Martinez / Danielle Kwasnik vs Tara Hurley / Leigh Henderson5-7, 2-6
2026-03-21vs Williams/KnoxvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bell / Danielle Kwasnik vs Angela Strange / Sandi Wilson4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesGabriella Rimmer vs Lauren Heinrich2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Haselschwerdt / Jill Hoschette vs Brooke Williams / Victoria Sissom3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Huffman / Tammy Shrivalle vs Nicole White / Annie Adams2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Danielle Kwasnik
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Debi English
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.50
Gabriella Rimmer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.49
LOURDES BLANDINO
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.38
Paola Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.37
Maja Lugonjic
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.35
Megan Haselschwerdt
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.33
Jill Hoschette
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Isabel Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Tammy Shrivalle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Lisa Huffman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.06
Patsy Fischer
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debi English + Megan Haselschwerdt6165% games+12.6% vs expected
Isabel Cunningham + Patsy Fischer8159% games+0.3% vs expected
Lisa Huffman + Paola Martinez6254% games−0.7% vs expected
Lisa Huffman + Megan Haselschwerdt224 matchesnot enough data
Patsy Fischer + LOURDES BLANDINO123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danielle Kwasnik
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Debi English
35W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
Gabriella Rimmer
1W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
LOURDES BLANDINO
36W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Paola Martinez
56W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Maja Lugonjic
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Megan Haselschwerdt
25W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Jill Hoschette
23W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Isabel Cunningham
13W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Tammy Shrivalle
43W–59L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Lisa Huffman
17W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Patsy Fischer
22W–35L career · 7 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.