Teams

DLiller.C-HS

2026 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Eve

13 players · average NTRP 3.31 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 14 7:00 PM
vs Dori LillerLaura Webb-Murrah
Hardscrabble
Sep 21 6:30 PM
Hope Valley Country Club
Sep 24 7:00 PM
vs Dori LillerLaura Webb-Murrah
Hardscrabble
Oct 5 8:00 PM
Durham Academy Upper School
2026-08-31vs DHertzog-HVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSheza Healey / Donna Spero vs Barbara Wilhelm / Jennifer Pyle6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTracy Stefan / Laura Webb-Murrah vs Stephanie Perun / Ruth Caccavale2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSally Mauriello / Jennifer Hoffmann vs Deborah Hertzog / Nancy Pike6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-24vs ABaxley.55.6.5C-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesDori Liller / Donna Spero vs Donna Misa / Sandy Willey7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSheza Healey / Sally Mauriello vs Rita Burgess / Angela Baxley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Macdonald / Millie Hunter vs Jeanne Murray / Meta Kuehn7-6, 6-2
2026-08-10vs DHertzog-HVCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Hoffmann / Sally Mauriello vs Barbara Wilhelm / Elisabeth Wiener6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAltagracia Evert / Pat Rowe vs Jennifer Pyle / Deborah Hertzog6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDori Liller / Millie Hunter vs Cecily Peterson / Elizabeth Yancy2-6, 2-6
2026-08-03vs ABaxley.55.6.5C-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesAltagracia Evert / Millicent Snow vs Shirley Chapman / Donna Misa6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Webb-Murrah / Jennifer Hoffmann vs Angela Baxley / Rita Burgess1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTracy Stefan / Donna Spero vs Lisa Mason / Zana Piric6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DLiller.C-HS1133649
2ABaxley.55.6.5C-DUR0112427

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Millicent Snow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Donna Spero
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.18
Laura Webb-Murrah
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Sally Mauriello
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Millie Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Pat Rowe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Tracy Stefan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Sheza Healey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Mary Macdonald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Altagracia Evert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Anne Redmond
published 3
2.66
Kristen Bradfield
published
2.56
Dori Liller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Millicent Snow + Altagracia Evert5357% games+10.3% vs expected
Sally Mauriello + Dori Liller5546% gamesnot enough data
Sally Mauriello + Pat Rowe6357% gamesnot enough data
Millie Hunter + Pat Rowe3548% gamesnot enough data
Sally Mauriello + Laura Webb-Murrah4451% gamesnot enough data
Altagracia Evert + Dori Liller4360% gamesnot enough data
Millie Hunter + Sally Mauriello2448% gamesnot enough data
Sally Mauriello + Millicent Snow4154% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Millicent Snow
67W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Donna Spero
20W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Laura Webb-Murrah
110W–118L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Sally Mauriello
144W–151L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Millie Hunter
64W–65L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
3.5
Pat Rowe
91W–123L career · 1 line in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Tracy Stefan
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
2.92
Sheza Healey
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Mary Macdonald
15W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Altagracia Evert
74W–69L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Anne Redmond
15W–20L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Kristen Bradfield
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Dori Liller
104W–101L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.