Teams

Kimble-JXN

2024 Adult 40 & Over-DLT · Men 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-11vs Hardin-DeltaLost 03
L#1 DoublesEasy Biedenharn / Derek Howard vs Heath Houston / Ricky Cousino6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTim Mask vs Michael Pinson5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephen Langley / Jeffrey Carmody vs S Carlton Gorton / Mark Hardin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-11vs Hardin-DeltaLost 03
L#1 DoublesJason Griffin / Chris Register vs Jeff Hardin / Alan Hargett7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Carmody vs Heath Houston6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesStephen Langley / Mark Howard vs Chris Lee / Michael Pinson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-05-04vs Hardin-DeltaWon 21
W#1 DoublesTim Mask / Kevin McKay vs Robert Stokes / Matthew Hicks6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRussell Dendy vs Chris Lee4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJason Griffin / Chris Register vs Ricky Cousino / Mark Hardin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-04vs Hardin-DeltaLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Carmody / Jason Griffin vs Jeff Hardin / Alan Hargett6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChris Register vs S Carlton Gorton6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTim Mask / Kevin McKay vs Robert Stokes / Matthew Hicks3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hardin-Delta229720164
2Kimble-JXN227920123

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Jeffrey Carmody
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.60
Chris Register
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Derek Howard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Russell Dendy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.54
Kevin McKay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Easy Biedenharn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Stephen Langley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Paul Kimble
published
3.36
Tim Mask
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Jason Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin McKay + Stephen Langley3252% gamesnot enough data
Derek Howard + Paul Kimble134 matchesnot enough data
Jason Griffin + Jeffrey Carmody224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Carmody
35W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Chris Register
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Derek Howard
7W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
Russell Dendy
4W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
Kevin McKay
30W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Easy Biedenharn
16W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Stephen Langley
20W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
Paul Kimble
32W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
Tim Mask
13W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
3.36
Jason Griffin
43W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.