Teams

McGuirt

2026 Auburn USTA 18 & Over Combo · 6.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-01vs DanielsLost 03
L#1 DoublesDerrick Frazier / David McGuirt vs Karl Rayborn / Yugo Maeda1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Wilkinson / Hongbiao Wang vs Robert Mahaney / Lamar Daniels4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Harbarger / David Hester vs Mohamed Eldemerdash / Tripp Oliver3-6, 1-6
2026-08-25vs DanielsLost 12
L#1 DoublesHenry Huberdeau / Eric Olsen vs Neil Desai / Robert Mahaney7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeming Wang / Hongbiao Wang vs Mohamed Eldemerdash / Yugo Maeda3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSam Neff / David Harbarger vs Karl Rayborn / Brian Young6-4, 7-6
2026-08-18vs DanielsLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid McGuirt / Nathan Maynard vs Lamar Daniels III / Lamar Daniels5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDerrick Frazier / Joe Wilkinson vs Lee Bryan / Brian Young2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDeming Wang / Eric Olsen vs Karl Rayborn / Tripp Oliver2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Daniels000000
2McGuirt000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Henry Huberdeau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Eric Olsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Deming Wang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Hongbiao Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Nathan Maynard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
David McGuirt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.67
Joe Wilkinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Derrick Frazier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.52
David Hester
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Sam Neff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hongbiao Wang + Deming Wang8554% games−3.3% vs expected
David Hester + Derrick Frazier134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Henry Huberdeau
18W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.41
3
Eric Olsen
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Deming Wang
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Hongbiao Wang
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
Nathan Maynard
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.82
3.5
David McGuirt
3W–13L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.70
Joe Wilkinson
1W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.67
3
Derrick Frazier
7W–20L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
3
David Hester
7W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
44%55%<1%
2.52
3
Geoffrey Williams
2W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.43
Sam Neff
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.