← Teams

SHC-Bunch

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Paul OHollaren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
John van Leeuwen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Patricia Eargle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Kiersten Lake
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Dan Bingham
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Roger Dehoog
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Megan Mandel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Victoria Cartwright
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.93
Autumn Bunch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-11-18Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRoger Dehoog / Elicia Putnam vs Cheryl Geisler / Charles Hahn4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDan Bingham / Lisa Barsotti vs Andrew Geisler / Heidi Kjos6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVictoria Cartwright / Scott Cartwright vs Alana Rhea / David Smiley6-2, 6-4
2023-11-11Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesVictoria Cartwright / Scott Cartwright vs Tracey Hodgson / Richard Jennings3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul OHollaren / Megan Mandel vs Sara Weinstein / Todd Khozein6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDan Bingham / Patricia Eargle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-22Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKiersten Lake / Paul OHollaren vs TRIET NGUYEN / Michelle Vo6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAutumn Bunch / Roger Dehoog vs THAO VAN / Ben Howard6-3, 6-4
2023-10-20Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesJohn van Leeuwen / Kiersten Lake vs Jordan Keomanivanh / Ginny Nguyen6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Cartwright / Victoria Cartwright vs Kevin Hughes / Carolyn Graeper6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAutumn Bunch / Dan Bingham vs Anthony Hoang / Colleen Nolan6-3, 6-4
2023-10-14Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesVictoria Cartwright / Scott Cartwright vs Cate Harrington / Ezra James6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMegan Mandel / Roger Dehoog vs Kimberly Parks / Ryan Manwiller6-1, 6-0
2023-10-08Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesScott Cartwright / Victoria Cartwright vs Michael Arellano / Ericka Nelson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn van Leeuwen / Kiersten Lake vs Anna Koepke / Peter Farrelly7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaul OHollaren / Elicia Putnam vs Sam Spieller / Jordan Brown6-2, 6-3
2023-10-01Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesJohn van Leeuwen / Kiersten Lake vs Rebe Colasurdo / Brad Wolverton6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRoger Dehoog / Elicia Putnam vs Bethany Bounds / Devin Tau6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJohn van Leeuwen / Kiersten Lake vs Sam Ko / Kim Tellin6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesElicia Putnam / Roger Dehoog vs Fernando Bessa / Susan Elmer6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Dan Bingham vs Paul Harwood / Andrea Yao4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Paul OHollaren
61W–25L career
0%70%30%
3.54
3.5
John van Leeuwen
55W–55L career
2%92%6%
3.32
3.5
Patricia Eargle
64W–51L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Kiersten Lake
75W–60L career
1%98%1%
3.26
3.5
Dan Bingham
46W–43L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Roger Dehoog
5W–43L career · type M
4%94%2%
3.25
3
Megan Mandel
37W–27L career
0%57%43%
3.09
3
Victoria Cartwright
58W–80L career
0%83%17%
2.96
3
Autumn Bunch
68W–71L career
0%92%8%
2.93

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.