Teams

Ja.Terrell55C

2025 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-13vs Ta.LeFevre55C7.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Brawner / Sarah Breazeale vs Andrea McCartney / Joan Faulkner3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKana Brinckerhoff / Noelle Jackson vs Susan Fanelly / Julie Dougherty7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Talton / Stacey Jacobs vs Lynn Dixon / Deb Lanier4-6, 6-7
2025-10-06vs Ca.Conzola55C7.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Brown / Kana Brinckerhoff vs Julie Brigham / Sarah Shelby6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHelen Harris / Lisa Talton vs Dara Haney / Laura Davidson6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStacey Jacobs / Rebecca Procter vs Camille Conzola / Helen Cuccaro6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-22vs De.Collins55CWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Rebecca Sears vs Christine Subasic / Jennifer Van Ness2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesStacey Jacobs / Rebecca Procter vs Debi Collins / Brenda Kullick6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElisebeth Gelardi / Andra Kinlaw vs Julie Sauls / Judith Gallagher2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-09-15vs Ta.LeFevre55C7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesKana Brinckerhoff / Noelle Jackson vs Susan Fanelly / Julie Dougherty6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndra Kinlaw / Helen Harris vs Diane Werner / Kellie Snider6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Brawner / Sarah Breazeale vs Andrea McCartney / Joan Faulkner2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-08vs Jo.Taylor55CWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Talton / Stacey Jacobs vs Isabelle Homes Gesher / Mary Cockrill4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Brown / Catherine Brawner vs Elizabeth Hensley / Jennifer Fogleman6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Kim McDonald vs Holly Camak / Carol Lekan0-6, 2-6
2025-08-25vs An.Pfeiffer55CLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Talton / Sarah Breazeale vs Julie Fleming / Tiffany Harris7-6, 0-4
W#2 DoublesRebecca Procter / Stacey Jacobs vs Lisa Scott / Stephanie Rabby6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesElisebeth Gelardi / Rebecca Sears vs Monica Shea-Henderson / Nancy Baird6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-08-18vs Jo.Lake55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesHelen Harris / Andra Kinlaw vs Daphne Driscoll / Wendy Brooker6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNoelle Jackson / Rebecca Procter vs Stacey Giglio / Tracey Carlin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Lisa Talton vs Nancy Gugliotta / Susan Hembarsky4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-04vs Ca.Conzola55C7.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Talton / Elisebeth Gelardi vs Laura Davidson / Dara Haney6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Procter / Sarah Breazeale vs Helen Cuccaro / Camille Conzola7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Kana Brinckerhoff
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.76
Noelle Jackson
published
3.66
Lisa Talton
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published 4
3.66
Catherine Brawner
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.63
Andra Kinlaw
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Rebecca Sears
published
3.46
Rebecca Procter
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Helen Harris
published
3.44
Elisebeth Gelardi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Sarah Breazeale
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Stacey Jacobs
published
3.15
Paula Hale
published
2.73
Beverly Rubin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Harris + Sarah Breazeale6167% games+12.1% vs expected
Lisa Talton + Rebecca Procter11853% games−4.1% vs expected
Elisebeth Gelardi + Beverly Rubin3546% games−8.3% vs expected
Catherine Brawner + Lisa Talton4553% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Procter + Beverly Rubin3544% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Breazeale + Rebecca Procter4353% gamesnot enough data
Andra Kinlaw + Kana Brinckerhoff5154% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Talton + Sarah Breazeale224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kana Brinckerhoff
238W–110L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Noelle Jackson
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Lisa Talton
120W–112L career · 12 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Catherine Brawner
111W–93L career · 7 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Andra Kinlaw
117W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Rebecca Sears
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Rebecca Procter
185W–147L career · 5 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Helen Harris
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Elisebeth Gelardi
97W–87L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Sarah Breazeale
111W–87L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Stacey Jacobs
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Paula Hale
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3
Beverly Rubin
85W–106L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.