Teams

BAY:Double Agents:Scott/Metz

2023 WMA Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 1

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-11vs LTC:Double Trouble:AndrettaWon 20
W#1 DoublesTherese Ross / Ivan Enriquez Leal vs Laurie Andretta / Gregory Stevens6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelinda Mason / Randy Yanoshak vs Julia Leedham Rindfuss / Craig Goebel6-3, 6-3
2023-05-21vs LTC:LoveAll:BaxterLost 12
L#1 DoublesIvan Enriquez Leal / Kim DeShields vs Curtis Hardaway / Eileen Hirsch5-7, 2-1
L#2 DoublesBen Lewis / Amy Corsetti vs Sehoon Ahn / Toon Fuderich2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRichard Getler / Melinda Calianos vs Craig Cohen / Georganne Sexton5-7, 5-3, 1-0
2023-04-29vs ETC:Wonder Team:FawthropSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRicardo Metz / Anne Paradis vs Sowrirajan Srinivasan / Pam Brenner-Newton6-3, 3-6, 3-4
W#2 DoublesEstate Kokosadze / Suzanne Koch vs Armand Wray / Melissa Follansbee7-6, 7-5
2023-04-16vs LTC:Double Trouble:AndrettaWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelinda Mason / Ivan Enriquez Leal vs Samantha Edwards / Didier Voisin6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTherese Ross / Estate Kokosadze vs Laurie Andretta / Lavalier Alves6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Koch / Mark Conrad vs Lori McMahon / Gregory Stevens4-6, 6-2, 6-2
2023-03-25vs LTC:LoveAll:BaxterLost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Ferriter / Melinda Calianos vs Jeff Palmer / Dee Dice6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBen Lewis / Amy Corsetti vs Randy Gobeil / Cheryl Ruell4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRandy Yanoshak / Melinda Mason vs Craig Cohen / Eileen Hirsch1-6, 1-6
2023-03-12vs ETC:Wonder Team:FawthropWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnne Paradis / Ricardo Metz vs Patricia Coffey / Frank Skrzypek4-6, 6-3, 0-2
W#2 DoublesChris Ferriter / Amy Corsetti vs Irene Madden / Eric Vosseller6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTherese Ross / Estate Kokosadze vs Marc LaPierre / Kristen Triba7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 Mixed 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTC:LoveAll:Baxter5112613139
2BAY:Double Agents:Scott/Metz4211716152
3ETC:Wonder Team:Fawthrop2481024201
4LTC:Double Trouble:Andretta1551328208

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Ben Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Chris Ferriter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Melinda Mason
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Richard Getler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Therese Ross
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Estate Kokosadze
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Jacqueline Scott
published
3.12
Anne Paradis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Ricardo Metz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Ruth Critcher
published
2.73
Amy Corsetti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kim DeShields
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Conrad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Yanoshak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Suzanne Koch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Scott + Ricardo Metz11463% games+4.2% vs expected
Melinda Mason + Chris Ferriter8164% gamesnot enough data
Ricardo Metz + Therese Ross5162% gamesnot enough data
Melinda Mason + Randy Yanoshak2447% gamesnot enough data
Therese Ross + Estate Kokosadze6061% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline Scott + Randy Yanoshak1446% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Koch + Chris Ferriter5074% gamesnot enough data
Kim DeShields + Ben Lewis3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ben Lewis
98W–44L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Chris Ferriter
150W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.74
Melinda Mason
96W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Richard Getler
126W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.53
Therese Ross
84W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.51
Estate Kokosadze
23W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
Jacqueline Scott
76W–74L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Anne Paradis
31W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Ricardo Metz
54W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99
Ruth Critcher
30W–48L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
2.87
3
Amy Corsetti
48W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Kim DeShields
41W–42L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mark Conrad
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Randy Yanoshak
4W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Suzanne Koch
31W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.