Teams

PW.McClure

2025 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-19vs ANP.FehervariLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Dexheimer / Lisa Slater vs Christine Qubeck / Audrey Hollett4-6, 2-6
2025-09-03vs PW.KraftSplit 11
L#2 DoublesStephanie Levin / Amy Dexheimer vs Terri Levine / Penny Kraft6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah van Saun / Emily Knier vs Nishi Patel / Jan Stewart6-1, 6-1
2025-09-03vs TOC.EllisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Slater / Amy Dexheimer vs Kelly Schomber / Arin Vaughan3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarah van Saun / Jennifer McClure vs Matalaba Napier / Dyvonne Ellis3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-27vs CAS.DeAngelisLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah van Saun / Julie Swanson vs Yuna Kim / Judith McGowan1-6, 1-6
2025-08-21vs ANP.FehervariLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer McClure / Sarah van Saun vs Michelle Alarcon / Katie Hungarter3-6, 2-6
2025-08-20vs TOC.EllisLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah van Saun / Amy Dexheimer vs Kelly Schomber / Paola Karina Ubilla Jofre1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 40 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Sarah van Saun
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.77
Stephanie Levin
published
Cesely Smith
published 3
2.67
Sandra Byrne
published
2.47
Lisa Slater
published
2.35
Smithey Hashagen
published
2.15
Brenna Magliulo
published 2.5
2.07
Jennifer McClure
published
2.04
Lisa Bradley
published
2.02
Amy Dexheimer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Julie Ley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah van Saun + Amy Dexheimer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sarah van Saun
75W–80L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Stephanie Levin
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Cesely Smith
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Byrne
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
Lisa Slater
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
Smithey Hashagen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Brenna Magliulo
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Jennifer McClure
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Lisa Bradley
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Amy Dexheimer
21W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Julie Ley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.