Teams

Team 6 Arlington Aces VII

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-24vs Team 5 Ageless AllstarsWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrandon Wales / PJ Barbour vs Arvind Jairam / Alexander Sears6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesArtan Guzja / Richard Gauthier vs Matthew Day / Robert Dougherty6-3, 6-3
2023-07-23vs Team 4 District AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Gauthier / Miguel Mendoza vs Jonathan Ramseur / Justin Yu3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJon Felts / Mikhail Velasco vs Jin Kim / Jeremy Symons4-6, 0-6
2023-07-07vs Team 5 Ageless AllstarsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDan Wagener / Brandon Wales vs Marc Gori / Arvind Jairam6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRichard Gauthier / Jon Felts vs Matthew Day / Alexander Sears6-3, 6-4
2023-06-30vs Team 3 PiF SummerWon 10
W#2 DoublesWesley Stien / Brandon Wales vs Lenny Williams / Brian Lynk6-3, 6-2
2023-06-18vs Team 4 District AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Gauthier / Kiet Ly vs Frank Leonard / Jonathan Ramseur4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMikhail Velasco / Dan Wagener vs Jeremy Symons / STEPHEN ROMIG6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-16vs Team 1Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKiet Ly / Richard Gauthier vs Raighne Delaney / Joe Napolitano1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Brandon Wales
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Joel Velasquez
published 4
3.27
Christopher Swider
published 3.5
Richard Gauthier
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Dan Wagener
published 3.5
2.71
Miguel Mendoza
published
2.68
Mikhail Velasco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kiet Ly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mikhail Velasco + Richard Gauthier033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brandon Wales
65W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
4
Joel Velasquez
68W–69L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Christopher Swider
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Richard Gauthier
47W–69L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Dan Wagener
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Miguel Mendoza
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Mikhail Velasco
42W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Kiet Ly
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.