Teams

Salvador Hacks

2026 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 4.5 Adult Men

17 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-13vs Overserves & UnderdogsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMitchell Stoller / Robert Gorham vs Rodrigo Garza / Daniel Valverde5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-11-12vs Overserves & UnderdogsLost 13
W#1 SinglesRodrigo Arrangoiz vs Henry Lujan6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMitchell Stoller / Isidro Gomez vs GABRIELE GHINI / Carlos Ramirez6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFelipe Torres / Jorge Ramirez vs Ricardo Baraldi / Octavio Ruiz Chavez4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#4 DoublesFelipe Echeverri / Max Cronwall vs Jonathan Drucker / Jose Buezas6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-11-01vs Aller (Doral Park)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTony Franco / Njavwa Mulwanda vs Diego Pena Blanco / Fernan Esquivel4-6, 0-6
2025-10-18vs Overserves & UnderdogsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDenis Pierrot / Isidro Gomez vs Octavio Ruiz Chavez / Adrian Peredo6-2, 6-1
L#4 DoublesFelipe Echeverri / Michael Berkowitz vs Tom Davidson / Carlos Ramirez3-6, 3-6
2025-10-11vs Aller (Doral Park)Split 11
W#1 SinglesRodrigo Arrangoiz vs RICARDO GIRON6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesIsidro Gomez / Denis Pierrot vs Diego Pena Blanco / Carlos Miranda3-6, 1-6
2025-09-27vs Overserves & UnderdogsWon 21
L#1 DoublesDenis Pierrot / Robert Gorham vs Jose Hidalgo / Werner Vondrak5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesFelipe Torres / Isidro Gomez vs Tom Davidson / Carlos Ramirez1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#4 DoublesNjavwa Mulwanda / Raymond Hackney vs Octavio Ruiz Chavez / David Lopez6-2, 4-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Adult Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Overserves & Underdogs71241640311
2Salvador Hacks24161433242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Guilherme Pinheiro Moreira
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.42
Brian Ahmes
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.34
Mauricio Gomm Santos
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
4.32
Njavwa Mulwanda
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.30
Felipe Echeverri
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.26
Andrew Hellinger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Max Cronwall
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Mitchell Stoller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Raymond Hackney
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
Felipe Torres
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.17
Michael Berkowitz
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Isidro Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.09
Jorge Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.07
Denis Pierrot
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Tony Franco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Robert Gorham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rodrigo Arrangoiz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raymond Hackney + Njavwa Mulwanda5257% games+7.1% vs expected
Felipe Echeverri + Max Cronwall8458% games+4.3% vs expected
Raymond Hackney + Mauricio Gomm Santos11461% gamesnot enough data
Isidro Gomez + Jorge Ramirez9455% gamesnot enough data
Raymond Hackney + Andrew Hellinger4848% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Hellinger + Guilherme Pinheiro Moreira3253% gamesnot enough data
Robert Gorham + Andrew Hellinger134 matchesnot enough data
Felipe Echeverri + Andrew Hellinger404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Guilherme Pinheiro Moreira
55W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
4.49
4.5
Brian Ahmes
52W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
4.42
Mauricio Gomm Santos
71W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
4.34
Njavwa Mulwanda
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
Felipe Echeverri
58W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Andrew Hellinger
46W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
Max Cronwall
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
Mitchell Stoller
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Raymond Hackney
157W–112L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Felipe Torres
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Michael Berkowitz
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
Isidro Gomez
14W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
Jorge Ramirez
90W–77L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Denis Pierrot
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
4.07
Tony Franco
43W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
4.04
Robert Gorham
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Rodrigo Arrangoiz
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.