Teams

Cain

2025 CVTA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · Women 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-02vs ChenLost 12
L#1 DoublesBethany Huckaby / Sharon Phillips vs Lucky Chan / Jamie Chen3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLucy Leaming / Leigh Dickson vs Ashley Olvera / Charlene Mathis4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoy Suskind / Sarah Corbin vs Sally Muschamp / Sarah Blasius1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-27vs ChenLost 12
L#1 DoublesLucy Leaming / Sue Garland vs Jamie Chen / Kimberly Brown6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTeresa Cain / Julie Lott vs Shirley Rutledge / Lucky Chan2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRegina Hicks / Layne Scoggins vs Sally Muschamp / Cindy Logan4-6, 0-1
2025-08-26vs CVTA/Amanda NelsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeresa Cain / Lisa Quinn vs Jennifer Martin / Jenna Thomas3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele Nichols / Regina Hicks vs Ashlyn Thornton / Suni Carroll2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBethany Huckaby / Sarah Corbin vs Haley Henderson / Judy McGinnis1-6, 5-7
2025-08-19vs ReedLost 12
L#1 DoublesBethany Huckaby / Lisa Quinn vs Caroline Parker / Sarah Molnar0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSharon Phillips / Michele Nichols vs Birdie Reed / Kathy Piller7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJoy Suskind / Sarah Corbin vs Patti Ledbetter / Kathy Couturier3-6, 2-6
2025-08-05vs CVTA/Amanda NelsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesSue Garland / Michele Nichols vs Lindsey Langhans / Jenna Thomas1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLucy Leaming / Sharon Phillips vs Jennifer Martin / Becky George3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoy Suskind / Lisa Quinn vs Ashlyn Thornton / Shelly Bell0-6, 1-6
2025-07-29vs ReedLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Quinn / Regina Hicks vs Kathy Piller / Birdie Reed6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLayne Scoggins / Leigh Dickson vs Patti Ledbetter / Kathy Couturier2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTeresa Cain / Julie Lott vs Caroline Parker / Ashley Jennings6-2, 6-1
2025-07-22vs ChenLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeresa Cain / Sue Garland vs Jamie Chen / Kimberly Brown1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Phillips / Layne Scoggins vs Cindy Logan / Ashley Olvera7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoy Suskind / Sarah Corbin vs Sarah Blasius / Charlene Mathis6-4, 6-4
2025-07-15vs CVTA/Amanda NelsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesLucy Leaming / Leigh Dickson vs Jenna Thomas / Suni Carroll2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Nichols / Regina Hicks vs Olivia Williams / Amanda Nelson6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Quinn / Joy Suskind vs Jennifer Martin / Jewel Akpose4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Lucy Leaming
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Teresa Cain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Joy Suskind
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Michele Nichols
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.32
Layne Scoggins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Bethany Huckaby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.24
Sue Garland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Lisa Quinn
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.16
Regina Hicks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Sharon Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Leigh Dickson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Lott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Dickson + Sue Garland3351% games+0.1% vs expected
Joy Suskind + Lucy Leaming224 matchesnot enough data
Michele Nichols + Regina Hicks134 matchesnot enough data
Sue Garland + Sharon Phillips123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Quinn + Regina Hicks123 matchesnot enough data
Michele Nichols + Layne Scoggins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucy Leaming
7W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.56
Teresa Cain
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
Joy Suskind
16W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
Michele Nichols
12W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.34
Layne Scoggins
8W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.32
4
Bethany Huckaby
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.31
Sue Garland
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Lisa Quinn
23W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Regina Hicks
25W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Sharon Phillips
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Leigh Dickson
13W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Julie Lott
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.