← Teams

N OR-SHC-Lane

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.11 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Carmen Warda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Doug Denney
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.05
Gilbert Chiang
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 3
2.85
Patrick Priest
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Susanne Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Ann Fitts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Sharon Place
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Pete Baughman
published 3
2.61
William Place
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results9 ties
2025-06-01Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesPatrick Priest / Ann Fitts vs Kip Stevenson / Jani White6-1, 6-0
2025-05-10Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesCarmen Warda / Gilbert Chiang vs Lysa Morla Maxey / Scott Myers6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHeather Graham / Doug Denney vs Lynn Lotti / Bill Barnes6-0, 6-0
2025-04-27Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCarmen Warda / Gilbert Chiang vs David-Richard Layzekk / Linda Brown6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDoug Denney / Ivy Lane vs Kimberly Shaffer / Rutvij Desai6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Fitts / Stephen Drew vs Lori Andersen / Staley Cluts6-0, 6-0
2025-04-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesIvy Lane / Gilbert Chiang vs Lori Andersen / Rutvij Desai6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPatrick Priest / Susanne Cochran vs Vanessa Gallant / James Araujo6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLillian Lee / Doug Denney vs Michelle Hodges / Staley Cluts6-0, 6-3
2025-04-18Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesCarmen Warda / Gilbert Chiang vs Shelley Hutley / John Brady6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIvy Lane / Doug Denney vs Karen Kraus / David Floyd7-5, 6-3
2025-04-13Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCarmen Warda / Gilbert Chiang vs David Williams / Cynthia Ross-Brockett6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDoug Denney / Heather Graham vs Cindy Bennett / Jim Mounts6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesIvy Lane / Patrick Priest vs Douglas Bennett / Betty Roux1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-04Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesSusanne Cochran / Gilbert Chiang vs Lysa Morla Maxey / Scott Myers6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLillian Lee / Doug Denney vs Lynn Lotti / Michael Navarro6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-30Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSusanne Cochran / Gilbert Chiang vs Douglas Hill / Heather Sirr6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeather Graham / Doug Denney vs Lee Kriebaum / Tina Kriebaum6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSharon Place / Patrick Priest vs Cyndi Johnson / Doug Johnson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-16Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesGilbert Chiang / Carmen Warda vs Amy Korkowski / Greg Korkowski6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSharon Place / William Place vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Carmen Warda
68W–35L career
5%95%0%
3.16
3.5
Doug Denney
62W–36L career
5%95%0%
3.15
3
Gilbert Chiang
46W–22L career
0%69%31%
3.05
3
Patrick Priest
52W–49L career
0%97%3%
2.85
3
Susanne Cochran
82W–68L career
1%98%1%
2.78
3
Ann Fitts
19W–31L career · type S
6%91%3%
2.75
3
Sharon Place
38W–30L career
6%91%3%
2.75
3
Pete Baughman
13W–16L career · type S
8%91%1%
2.70
3
William Place
31W–50L career
14%86%0%
2.61

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.