Teams

CV-Ringer

2022 CV Masters' 70s League · CV-Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-02-17vs CV-ParkersonWon 20
W#1 DoublesColleen Muhlbradt / Farzaneh Kia vs Ilse Hine / Pam Jungaro6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJanet Daniel / Rebecca Bratlien vs Lindsay Price / Barbara Shelley0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-10vs CV-GiacominiWon 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Simpson / Rebecca Bratlien vs Michele Weddle / Phyllis Johnson6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2022-02-03vs LLW-CV-WillseySplit 11
W#1 DoublesColleen Muhlbradt / Carol Maier vs Marilou Rolfe / Leslie Zauher7-6, 7-5
L#5 DoublesReney Schild / Rebecca Bratlien vs Petra Gellner / Karen Felton1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-01-27vs CV-ParkersonLost 01
L#1 DoublesColleen Muhlbradt / Susan Mayer vs Ilse Hine / Julia Allen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-01-13Won 10
W#4 DoublesRebecca Bratlien / Theresa Brown vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Farzaneh Kia
published 4
3.66
Donna Simpson
published 3.5
3.54
Colleen Muhlbradt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Carol Maier
published 3.5
3.29
Rebecca Bratlien
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Roberta Dierks
published
Diane Fass
published 3
2.65
Susan Walker
published
Carol Carnish
published
Janet Daniel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Bratlien + Donna Simpson6070% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Farzaneh Kia
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Donna Simpson
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%11%89%
3.66
4
Colleen Muhlbradt
109W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Carol Maier
5W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Rebecca Bratlien
35W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.29
Roberta Dierks
21W–47L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Diane Fass
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Walker
6W–26L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
Carol Carnish
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Janet Daniel
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.