Teams

WI Mixed 18&Over 7.0 MALT Cusack

2025 WI Mixed 18 & Over · WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesChristopher Cusack / Angela Ridgely vs Jacob Immel / Erin Mohrbacker2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEmma Verret / Michael Finnegan vs Chase Peck / Shaina Gordon2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesMegan Cusack / Christopher Cusack vs Susan Parker / Farid Masrour6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMacAyla Schopp / Dan Bernhardt vs Julia Hazenberg / Edward Halsted1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPaula Riesch / Jose Nunes vs Amy Frederick / Jason Schleip6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesLuis Angeles / Emma Verret vs Ryan Pohle / Iris Kurman4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaula Riesch / Craig Atwood vs Abbey Fuszard / Nithin Sathyamoorthy3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMacAyla Schopp / Dan Bernhardt vs Jeremy Parrish / Eunji Oh4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesZonglin Han / Emma Verret vs Iris Kurman / John Jaeger1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTara Mohan / Craig Atwood vs Candice DeJarlais / John Montognese-Bergamini2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMacAyla Schopp / Christopher Cusack vs Jeremy Parrish / Eunji Oh4-6, 4-6
2025-07-11vs WI Mixed 18&Over 7.0 MALT ArmitageLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher Cusack / Tara Mohan vs Nick Marzotto / Aneta Kosturova4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEmma Verret / Michael Finnegan vs Ginny Quirk / Adam Cook1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Cusack / Dan Bernhardt vs Anne Yates / Rob Spence2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesTara Mohan / Jose Nunes vs Jacob Immel / Erin Mohrbacker3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristopher Cusack / Angela Ridgely vs Chase Peck / Jaryn Tuttle6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesZonglin Han / Paula Riesch vs Abby Eddy / Joe Tegtmeier6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 DoublesEmma Verret / Zonglin Han vs Eli Stickney / Trish Arreazola4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMegan Cusack / Jose Nunes vs Jim Perry / Joyce Coury6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMacAyla Schopp / Michael Finnegan vs Christian Voskuil / Susan Buzzard3-6, 2-6
2025-06-08vs WI Mixed 18&Over 7.0 MALT PuttiLost 12
W#1 DoublesLuis Angeles / Angela Ridgely vs Alex Dundas / Arpita Wahal7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChristopher Cusack / Tara Mohan vs Shaleen Deep / Megan Prahl4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJose Nunes / Megan Cusack vs Krish M / Jacqueline Brady1-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesMegan Cusack / Christopher Cusack vs Braden Schleip / Julia Hazenberg6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLuis Angeles / Angela Ridgely vs Yana Mavlyutov / Chris Isensee6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPaula Riesch / Craig Atwood vs Amy Frederick / Edward Halsted6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jose Nunes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.53
Christopher Cusack
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.41
Angela Ridgely
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Tara Mohan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Paula Riesch
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Craig Atwood
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Michael Finnegan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Dan Bernhardt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Emma Verret
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Idana Tang
published
Luis Angeles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
MacAyla Schopp
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Megan Cusack
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Zonglin Han
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Cusack + Christopher Cusack7552% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jose Nunes
59W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
3.5
Christopher Cusack
73W–50L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Angela Ridgely
156W–90L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
Tara Mohan
66W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Paula Riesch
53W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Craig Atwood
23W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Michael Finnegan
16W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Dan Bernhardt
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Emma Verret
7W–17L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Idana Tang
7W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Luis Angeles
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
MacAyla Schopp
12W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Cusack
43W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zonglin Han
31W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.