Teams

AYTC-Cosy's Deuce-Ma

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-25vs CAC/SL-Tiebreakers-AlmquistLost 12
L#1 DoublesRemi Dargent / Atreya Laxman vs Kishan Gnanamani / Chitradeep Barman0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesChristopher Ma / Filippo Montechiaro vs Gurmit Singh / Deepak Kumar1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKetil Freeman vs Soma Burela4-6, 2-6
2024-05-19vs TCSP-Weekend Warriors-ChouSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristopher Ma / Ketil Freeman vs Huai-Ping Lee / Shuai Li4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Tully vs Joshua Lee4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Arnesen / David Glekel vs Prithu Jain / Jason Schroeder1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesNiket Thakkar vs Li Wang7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2024-05-11vs MI-SelbySplit 22
W#1 DoublesRemi Dargent / Andy Quach vs Boyd Peterson / Manny McBride7-6, 2-4
W#1 SinglesJohn Tully vs Zach Zaborowski6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristopher Ma / Robert Arnesen vs Ken Wolfe / Saurabh Khandelwal2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesFilippo Montechiaro vs Eric Jaecks6-7, 3-4
2024-05-04vs PL-Aces & Lobs-KhullarLost 14
L#1 DoublesAndy Quach / Remi Dargent vs Sudhakar Pitchumani / Rajesh Gatti3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Tully vs Phani Meduri0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Gould / Chris Peterson vs Deepak Khullar / Eliuth Triana0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAtreya Laxman vs SANCHIT AGARWAL4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesYuxin Huang / Ketil Freeman vs Sudhir Raman / Amit Kejriwal0-6, 4-6
2024-04-27vs CP-TennisCowBoys-CheLost 05
L#1 DoublesRemi Dargent / Edward Almonte vs Frank Taylor / Eric Baird2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAtreya Laxman vs Tony Zhao0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKim Gould / Christopher Ma vs Jason Liang / Alex Ma2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesNiket Thakkar vs Xin Che4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDave Nurme / David Glekel vs Bob Isaacson / Marshall Winget3-6, 2-6
2024-04-21vs PSC-Poli18-OnuLost 14
L#1 DoublesEdward Almonte / Remi Dargent vs Dan Onu / David Jacobson7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJohn Tully vs Filip Bedjovski4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKetil Freeman / Christopher Ma vs Adrian Dragusanu / Radu Dragan3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAndy Quach vs Catalin Cozmei6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKim Gould / Chris Peterson vs Claudiu Bulai / Carlos Gomes3-6, 3-6
2024-04-07vs BC-Hitmen-SmithLost 12
L#1 DoublesEdward Almonte / Andy Quach vs Bruce Seeley / David Angelone3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Tully vs Murali Musturnagarajan6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRobert Arnesen / David Glekel vs Stephen Waltar / Matthew Klutznick1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-23vs NWW-ETC-BoxLost 13
L#1 DoublesRobert Arnesen / Christopher Ma vs Daniel Du / Erwin Gao4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Tully vs Ravi Vyas1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Glekel / Andy Quach vs Everett Seven / Jason Franklin3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChris Peterson / Kim Gould vs Mitchel Arene / Siddharth Bhatia1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Andy Quach
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.07
Atreya Laxman
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
John Tully
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Niket Thakkar
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Chris Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Dave Nurme
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
David Glekel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Filippo Montechiaro
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Remi Dargent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Ketil Freeman
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Christopher Ma
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Robert Arnesen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Yuxin Huang
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.26
Kim Gould
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Edward Almonte
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ketil Freeman + Remi Dargent2941% games+0.3% vs expected
Robert Arnesen + Christopher Ma4747% games−8.1% vs expected
Christopher Ma + Filippo Montechiaro2531% games−22.5% vs expected
Kim Gould + Chris Peterson1433% gamesnot enough data
Ketil Freeman + Christopher Ma044 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Ma + Edward Almonte134 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Ma + Kim Gould033 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Ma + John Tully033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andy Quach
42W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Atreya Laxman
16W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
John Tully
43W–47L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
3.04
Niket Thakkar
21W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Chris Peterson
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Dave Nurme
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
David Glekel
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Filippo Montechiaro
31W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Remi Dargent
24W–47L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Ketil Freeman
47W–102L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Christopher Ma
24W–73L career · 6 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Robert Arnesen
28W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.64
Yuxin Huang
13W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Kim Gould
28W–81L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.26
Edward Almonte
10W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.