Teams

KNO PURPLE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-06vs SS-H YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Prudhomme / Jennifer Muller vs Toni Lapp / Candace Sotwick6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRebecca Handley vs Traci Henry6-2, 6-0
2023-09-03vs LEBTC BLACKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCathy Nowak / Linda Prudhomme vs Kristi Snow / Cindy McFadden7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Baesman vs Christine Gish7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-23vs HW BLUELost 01
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Baesman vs Tiffanie Lenderman2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-08-16vs HRCA-N GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesCathy Nowak / Linda Prudhomme vs Melinda Grandy / Lisa Cabot3-6, 2-6
2023-08-09vs SS-D BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Baesman / Jennifer Muller vs Marie O'Neill / Adriana Sosa6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRebecca Handley vs Luci Ottati6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Roach / Linda Prudhomme vs Maria Jump / Pamela Abraham6-0, 6-0
2023-08-02vs HG GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Baesman / Jennifer Muller vs Katie Johnson / Debbie Lepetsos3-6, 4-6
2023-07-26vs KC-RH BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Prudhomme / Cathy Nowak vs Vicki Sullivan / Kim Barry2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRebecca Handley vs Peggy Cooper6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Baesman / Lori Roach vs Alicia Pucci / Allison Rooney6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Rebecca Handley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Elizabeth Baesman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.79
Barb Richards
published 3
2.73
Jennifer Muller
published
2.65
Linda Prudhomme
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.62
Cathy Nowak
published 3
2.31
Karla Goodhart
published
Lori Roach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Muller + Linda Prudhomme9652% games−2.8% vs expected
Cathy Nowak + Linda Prudhomme4545% games−3.8% vs expected
Barb Richards + Cathy Nowak213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rebecca Handley
76W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.38
3
Elizabeth Baesman
121W–122L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Barb Richards
94W–77L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79
Jennifer Muller
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
2.73
3
Linda Prudhomme
88W–90L career · 5 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
2.65
3
Cathy Nowak
20W–29L career · no lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
2.62
Karla Goodhart
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
0%91%9%
2.31
Lori Roach
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.