Teams

Team 2 FOREVER YOUNG 7.0

2023 NOVA Adult 55 & Over Indoor · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-13vs Team 3Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDina Bessa / Pamela Nix vs Joan Donoghue / Susan Malley2-6, 1-6
2023-08-06vs Team 3Won 21
L#1 DoublesPamela Nix / Paige Fishel vs Lori Huthoefer / Debbie Kem1-6, 4-5
W#2 DoublesMichelle O'Brien / Kim Leas vs Susan Malley / Beth Hill7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBoni Vinter / Elizabeth Marcotte vs Susan Hanback / Rhoda Pickering6-1, 6-1
2023-08-02Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Leas / Michelle O'Brien vs Rhoda Pickering / Susan Hanback7-6, 2-5
2023-07-29vs Team 3Won 20
W#1 DoublesPamela Nix / Paige Fishel vs Alison Bouwmeester / Bethany Mathis6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJeri Borsi / Janine Sweeney vs Lori Huthoefer / Joan Donoghue2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-25vs Team 3Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeri Borsi / Elizabeth Marcotte vs Anne Ward / Lynn Koggan6-4, 4-2
2023-07-21vs Team 3Won 10
W#1 DoublesKate Putt / Sharon Sabasteanski vs Bethany Mathis / Anne Ward7-6, 6-2
2023-07-17vs Team 3Won 21
L#1 DoublesMary Berkowitz / Sharon Sabasteanski vs Debbie Kem / Joan Donoghue4-6, 5-4
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Marcotte / Donna Lee vs Anne Ward / Lori Huthoefer6-2, 2-5
W#3 DoublesMichelle O'Brien / Kim Leas vs Christine Driscoll / Beth Hill6-2, 6-4
2023-07-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesDina Bessa / Jeri Borsi vs Susan Hanback / Susan Malley6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Paige Fishel
published
3.40
Kim Leas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Sharon Sabasteanski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Jeri Borsi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Mary Berkowitz
published
3.29
Christine Hopkins
published 3.5
3.27
Pamela Nix
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Mary Krueger
published
3.19
Kate Putt
published
3.17
Elizabeth Marcotte
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Diane Diner
published 3.5
3.11
Boni Vinter
published 3.5
2.91
Dina Bessa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Marcotte + Mary Krueger3257% games+3.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Marcotte + Jeri Borsi111050% games+2.2% vs expected
Dina Bessa + Pamela Nix123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Fishel
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Kim Leas
142W–143L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Sharon Sabasteanski
255W–176L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Jeri Borsi
123W–102L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.32
Mary Berkowitz
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Christine Hopkins
10W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Pamela Nix
193W–201L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Mary Krueger
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Kate Putt
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Elizabeth Marcotte
166W–175L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Diane Diner
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Boni Vinter
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Dina Bessa
102W–139L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.