Teams

MD.Frohock

2024 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLaurie Godfrey / Jonay Zies vs Jamie Maness / Lisa Bradley1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-19vs LOCH.CockayneSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJonay Zies / Cheryl McCurdy vs Linda Schmitt / Erin Cockayne4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Loyd / Sue Mooney vs Tracey King / Julie Quinn6-4, 6-0
2024-09-18vs BENT.WagnerLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatherine Ruffolo / Nikki Thigpen vs Alejandra Monsalve / Megan Wagner1-6, 1-6
2024-09-05Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJonay Zies / Nikki Thigpen vs Maki Ishizaka / Virginia Grau1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSteph Frohock / Sue Mooney vs Asuka Yamada / Bonnie Mulder4-6, 0-6
2024-08-29vs ANP.HainSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSteph Frohock / Jonay Zies vs Ruth Smith / Lauren Doyle6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNikki Thigpen / Amy Loyd vs Sabrina Hsin Hua Lee / Ann Stoddard3-6, 2-6
2024-08-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJonay Zies / Nikki Thigpen vs Rebecca King / Sarah Lewis0-6, 1-6
2024-08-15vs ANP.LaineLost 02
L#2 DoublesSteph Frohock / Nikki Thigpen vs Claudia Bourbeau / Michelle Alarcon4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJonay Zies / Annie Pilz vs Christine Lennon / Rebecca Peart6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Julia Wade
published
2.96
Jamie Hahn
published 3
2.68
Jonay Zies
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.43
Steph Frohock
published
2.42
Nikki Thigpen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.34
Laurie Godfrey
published
2.30
Annie Pilz
published 2.5
2.20
Cheryl McCurdy
published 2.5
2.17
Sue Mooney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Katherine Ruffolo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nikki Thigpen + Jonay Zies4739% games−31.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Wade
31W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.32
3
Jamie Hahn
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.96
2.5
Jonay Zies
27W–30L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%8%92%
2.68
Steph Frohock
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%70%30%
2.43
2.5
Nikki Thigpen
15W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%73%27%
2.42
Laurie Godfrey
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Annie Pilz
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Cheryl McCurdy
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Sue Mooney
52W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.17
Katherine Ruffolo
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.