Teams

GEPTA/Adult 3.5W/Garcia/EPTC#6

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.20 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jammie Price
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Adriana Galindo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.94
Irma Portillo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.84
Esther Orona
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 3
2.44
Eufemia Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
Kati Hunyadi
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published
Marcelle Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Marisol Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Patricia Arreola
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Raquel Sanchez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 36% · published
Roshelly Paliza
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Sara Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Sharon Ransom
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Vanessa Avelar
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
Veronica Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eufemia Garcia + Jammie Price4350% games+11.3% vs expected
Eufemia Garcia + Sharon Ransom161252% games+3.3% vs expected
Adriana Galindo + Marisol Ramirez121646% games−2.5% vs expected
Maria del Carmen Ledezma + Sara Blanco61045% gamesnot enough data
Eufemia Garcia + Sara Blanco0931% gamesnot enough data
Veronica Gonzalez + Sara Blanco3550% gamesnot enough data
Adriana Galindo + Kati Hunyadi2445% gamesnot enough data
Esther Orona + Kati Hunyadi2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jammie Price
47W–44L career · 21 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Adriana Galindo
27W–50L career · 10 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Irma Portillo
21W–40L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Esther Orona
115W–106L career · 37 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Eufemia Garcia
81W–124L career · type A · 32 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Kati Hunyadi
74W–65L career · 41 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marcelle Fernandez
24W–10L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
22W–46L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marisol Ramirez
47W–79L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Arreola
47W–63L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raquel Sanchez
10W–6L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roshelly Paliza
21W–31L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Blanco
48W–72L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Ransom
66W–105L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Avelar
9W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Veronica Gonzalez
50W–71L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.