Teams

SChandra (Charlotte Tennis)

2026 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-28vs SStaley/SHerndon (WSRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesShruti Chandra / Lauren Olson vs Kathy Aitken / Kristyn Atkins5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLaura Batten vs Kimberly Borans6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Vicki Greenway vs Tasha Cooper / Tracy Lacroix2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-04-21vs DCallinan (Raintree)Won 21
W#1 DoublesShruti Chandra / Lauren Olson vs Lauren Humphries / Marie Foley6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLeigh Gray vs Kirstin Martin2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Laura Batten vs Laura Sullivan / Erin Pavelchak6-3, 6-3
2026-04-14vs AMcCurry/LPorcher (Carmel)Won 31
W#1 DoublesShruti Chandra / Lauren Olson vs Debbie Porter / Keri Beach6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLeigh Gray vs Crystal Allen0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Batten / Melodie Ohaus vs Casey Fuller / Julie Clements6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Seth / Vicki Greenway vs Julia Tripodes / Anne McCurry6-3, 6-3
2026-04-07vs SAndrews/JSmith (Raintree)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Jane Moncayo vs Stacy Andrews / Tricia Shaw1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLaura Batten vs Jill Smith6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShruti Chandra / Vicki Greenway vs Nicole Love / Denise Dexter6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLaura Seth / Marjorie Wagner vs Erika Efthymiou / Elizabeth Harvey2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-31vs THyso (Life Time)Lost 13
W#1 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Lauren Olson vs Jennifer Siddall / Tiffany Vaughn6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLeigh Gray vs Teresa Riley0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShruti Chandra / Vicki Greenway vs Jennifer Boyd / Raegan Wright0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Seth / Marjorie Wagner vs Elizabeth Myers / Catherine Holwager4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-03-24vs CMiles (Hornets Nest)Split 22
W#1 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Jane Moncayo vs Sharon Smaston / Robyn Haug6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLeigh Gray vs Sarah Barden3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVicki Greenway / Shruti Chandra vs Karen Lindquist / Karen Moss3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarjorie Wagner / Laura Seth vs Miranda Berkovich / Ann Stawski3-6, 3-6
2026-03-17vs VBorkey/KMarks (Pine Lake CC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Jane Moncayo vs Gayle Hoy / Karen Holbrook6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLaura Batten vs Anne-marie Morton6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesShruti Chandra / Vicki Greenway vs Jessica Hargis / Virginia Borkey6-4, 6-2
2026-03-10vs ACombs/KMacrone (BCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJane Moncayo / Melodie Ohaus vs Kate MacRone / Suzanne Meeker6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShruti Chandra / Lauren Olson vs Lisa Short / Laura Lowder6-1, 6-0
2026-03-03vs KCronin/JJoliet (Piper Glen)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Batten / Melodie Ohaus vs Katie Bissett / Katie Cronin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShruti Chandra / Jane Moncayo vs Tyler Brody / Sarah Garner5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLaura Seth / Marjorie Wagner vs Kathy Harborne / Lori Broome4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Melodie Ohaus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Jane Moncayo
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.78
Shruti Chandra
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Laura Batten
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Marjorie Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Vicki Greenway
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.54
Laura Seth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Leigh Gray
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jeannine Mortenson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melodie Ohaus + Jane Moncayo4549% games+1.0% vs expected
Shruti Chandra + Vicki Greenway3347% games+0.3% vs expected
Melodie Ohaus + Shruti Chandra3345% games−1.1% vs expected
Melodie Ohaus + Vicki Greenway1440% games−10.7% vs expected
Marjorie Wagner + Laura Seth3741% games−11.1% vs expected
Laura Batten + Melodie Ohaus314 matchesnot enough data
Jeannine Mortenson + Laura Seth134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Moncayo + Shruti Chandra033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Melodie Ohaus
98W–142L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Jane Moncayo
49W–68L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
Shruti Chandra
26W–28L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
Laura Batten
11W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Marjorie Wagner
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Vicki Greenway
34W–75L career · 6 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
2.59
Laura Seth
9W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
Leigh Gray
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
Jeannine Mortenson
10W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.